Ah…thank you! Obviously I’m on the ignorant side regarding encryption and authentication. However, I do know I’ve had most of these NSM2s reporting higher modulation rates, despite being set for WPA2/TKIP.
I think once I make sure all the CPE are running AES, then I can set the Wavion AP for AES only and cross my fingers… From: Kevin Lamothe [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 6:29 PM To: Jeremy Grip; 'Ubiquiti Users Group' Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 5.5.10 Security Bug? (was NBM2 vs. PBE M2-400 in trees) That's the normal behavior on XW units. Updated wireless spec discontinued TKIP and WEP for authentication methods. Can you force your AP to run in AES mode only? TKIP also limits you from using the higher QAM16 and QAM64 rates ie mcs 13-15 Sent from Samsung Mobile -------- Original message -------- From: Jeremy Grip Date:2014-10-20 17:49 (GMT-05:00) To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' Subject: [Ubnt_users] 5.5.10 Security Bug? (was NBM2 vs. PBE M2-400 in trees) So…. I went to replace one of those NanoBridge M2’s with a NanoBeam M2 after upgrading it to 5.5.10. The (Wavion) AP is configured for WPA2 mixed mode PSK // AES +TKIP // PSK by passphrase and all of the NanoBridges were authenticating fine set for WPA2-TKIP // PSK and the passphrase or WPA2-AES // PSK and the passphrase. However, the ‘Beam running 5.5.10 has no WPA2-TKIP setting, only WPA2-AES. It will not authenticate with that setting and the proper passphrase. The log of the AP shows an “incorrect password” message. Going to downgrade to 5.5.9 and try it again….. Jeremy Grip North Branch Networks,LLC
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
