Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > Reverting to Dapper would not be a great outcome - but it would be > preferable to shipping with artwork that does not meet our standards. > We've invested a huge amount of time and effort in the Edgy art > community process, and thus far we don't have a final set of images > that IMO cut the mustard. That's not a critique of the capabilities of > any of the individual artists, just that we haven't pulled it all > together as well as we hoped. > > So. I'm continuing to speak with the AiC and art community members (we > have had a series of conference calls in recent days, trying to > converge on a good looking result). I hope we can get a set that rocks > in place, but I'm not going to delay Edgy for that. I'd rather use it > as a learning experience than live with art that I don't think > reflects the best of what we can do as a community. > > Mark In the name of failsafe...
http://bay01.imagebay.com/full_view.php?view=7947_ubuntu-glow-standard.jpg would this do? Viper550 -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
