Cheers
2006/10/12, Viper550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> Reverting to Dapper would not be a great outcome - but it would be
> preferable to shipping with artwork that does not meet our standards.
> We've invested a huge amount of time and effort in the Edgy art
> community process, and thus far we don't have a final set of images
> that IMO cut the mustard. That's not a critique of the capabilities of
> any of the individual artists, just that we haven't pulled it all
> together as well as we hoped.
>
> So. I'm continuing to speak with the AiC and art community members (we
> have had a series of conference calls in recent days, trying to
> converge on a good looking result). I hope we can get a set that rocks
> in place, but I'm not going to delay Edgy for that. I'd rather use it
> as a learning experience than live with art that I don't think
> reflects the best of what we can do as a community.
>
> Mark
In the name of failsafe...
http://bay01.imagebay.com/full_view.php?view=7947_ubuntu-glow-standard.jpg
would this do?
Viper550
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
