On 10/12/06, Mark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you read that document (have you?) you'll see that the art team leads > explicitly set their own, personalised deadlines that are in sync with those > of the distro. It's not /the same/ it's an appropriate set of deadlines that > were a good plan - and it was not followed. > > As a result - late night and early morning phone calls and emails from the > team leads trying to get this done. >
Yes - because the art work hasn't been a last second, deadline missing thing in the last four releases has it? To blame the community process for failures which have happened in all the other releases is a bit disingenuous, although accept you were trying to avoid this by setting up a formal process. Anyway, I understand you don't want to waste time on this further, so thanks for clearing up your decision. I still suggest that artwork which doesn't meet your expectations is better than retaining the same artwork as Dapper resulting in a peoples expectations for radical change in Edgy being dashed further. Thanks, Mark Thanks, Mark -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
