I was re-verifying some of the major decision points to make sure this
goes the right paths (after all this crossed three digits of builds
overall) and as my gut feeling told me, something is even more odd.

I went back and ended up no more being able to reproduce the good case.
Not even with the PPA non-debugsymbol non-proposed build in:
https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/lp-2089779-libsdl-rebuild-2.30.9/+build/29314882

That obviously resets a lot of assumptions and efforts.

Resetting tets environments from scratch:
1. autopkgtest of wesnoth on plucky with --apt-pocket=proposed=src:libsdl2
2. autopkgtest of wesnoth on plucky

Trying against last weeks good/bad no change rebuilds
A. default build dep, no debug symbols built:
  
https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/lp-2089779-libsdl-rebuild-2.30.9/+build/29314882
B. A. proposed build dep, debug symbols built:
  
https://launchpad.net/~paelzer/+archive/ubuntu/lp-2089779-libsdl-rebuild-2.30.9/+build/29317135
C. check if it is infectionous in any way, after A/B force installing the 
former good via
  sudo apt install libsdl2-2.0-0=2.30.6+dfsg-1

1: fails
2: works
1A: fails
2A: fails
1B: fails
2B: fails
1C: works
2C: works

So indeed the former was a fluke and no change rebuild to fix was therefore a 
bad try.
Back to the drawing board, maybe also double check if the local git build was 
really working ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089779

Title:
  Buffer overflow in autopkgtest of wesnoth

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost1.83/+bug/2089779/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to