I apologize for singling out this post, but... On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:37 AM, aYo Binitie <ayobini...@gmail.com> wrote:
> XFCE - I have no idea about but it was super we would not be all having > these rants. > aYo > > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > > I think this is a very, very poor argument. But iyou are not alone however. I haven't read any rants in this thread (well, maybe one) but I have seen a lot of ignorant whinging. There has been a vocal minority that asked, "Why change from GNOME 2?" or some other variant of that statement. But it appears that these people neither understand why we made a decision nor have any understanding of XFCE and how similar it is to GNOME 2. So, the "rants" are ignorant protestations about change. This has no reflection on XFCE. I challenge you (not just you aYo, but everyone) who thinks XFCE isn't "super" or good or isn't GNOME 2 to actually try it. Try it for a week. A day, even. If someone can use XFCE and then provide a good fact based argument for not using XFCE *OR* can provide a viable alternative we would very much like to hear them. I mean that sincerely. What I don't like, appreciate, or find useful is ignorant whinging without providing any reasons, facts, or alternatives. ScottL
-- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
