Again with Gnome 3??? I think people doesnt understand that moving to Gnome 3 is A BIG CHANGE!!!
The ui is completely diferent, the workflow is diferent. Gnome 3 is made to use full screen widows. Its very new, no much teaking is possible, at least for now. XFCE is a PROVEN, STABLE and SIMILAR Desktop enviroment. And on top of all, there is already a Ubuntu derivative with XFCE. If this is not enough for people to understand, well try each one for 2 3 weeks and then say what things dont like on XFCE for a STUDIO workflow. 2011/5/15 Michael Dickson <[email protected]>: > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 11:14 -0500, Scott Lavender wrote: >> I apologize for singling out this post, but... >> >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:37 AM, aYo Binitie <[email protected]> >> >> I challenge you (not just you aYo, but everyone) who thinks XFCE isn't >> "super" or good or isn't GNOME 2 to actually try it. Try it for a >> week. A day, even. > > Umm, maybe the same could be said for Gnome3... > > Rather than dump it (or Unity which will apparently be the "default" > Ubuntu desktop) for yet another DE which itself has pros and cons. > Being direct, I haven't seen a "viable" argument yet for why a change is > necessary. Except perhaps that some folks don't like Gnome3. > > And sorry, that's not a whine. Its me stating the truth as I see it. > > Mike > > > > -- > Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users > -- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
