On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 17:12 +0200, Ralf wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:24 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: > > > Ralph, im going to assume a question here. that question would be... > > "will the ubuntustudio metapackages *require* XFCE?" > > theres one metapackage right now called ubuntustudio-desktop. that > > would be the one that would pull XFCE in, and switch DE's. theres no > > reason why the others should do that, or need to do that, and thats a > > very valid point that i will keep in mind as we move forward. this > > question you posed also gave me a great idea. maybe we can just take > > the current ubuntustudio-desktop (with gnome2), leave it as-is (so > > there is no maintenance) rename it ubuntustudio-desktop-gnome, and > > leave that in place as long as gnome2 is around. in that way, a user > > could install the current ubuntu vanilla, and get switched to the good > > 'ol gnome current setup that we all know and love by running sudo > > apt-get install ubuntustudio-destkop-gnome. this package could be > > around as long as ubuntu has gnome2 in the repo. i will ask how > > challenging that could be to implement that, unless you would like to > > take that on Ralph? it would be great if you could help us > > constructively resolve some of these issues users are having with this > > UI switch. > > A good idea to provide 2 different desktop meta packages, if somebody > has the time and knowledge to maintain the GNOME package. > > I might have some time to contribute some work, but I guess not the > knowledge to help here. Resp. how could I (and perhaps other people) > contribute something regarding to the DE issue? > > Ralf
PS: Pardon? No maintenance? What's the difference between a Ubuntu vanilla GNOME and the GNOME by the Ubuntu Studio package? -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users