You can apply for TA at the time of importation and HMRC will listen to 
retrospective applications.

 https://www.gov.uk/temporary-admission#authorisation-for-ta


"Retrospective authorisation
In exceptional circumstances, you may be able to apply for TA authorisation 
after goods have been imported. However, you’ll have to prove that there are 
‘exceptional’ circumstances - a general oversight isn’t accepted as such."

Phil Bartlett
Comtek Network Systems (UK) Ltd
+44 7794 907171

Sent from my iPhone

> On 22 Jan 2014, at 22:18, Mike Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 20 January 2014 13:40, Emma Frost <[email protected]> wrote:
>> So we're sort of at an impasse now and don't know how to help get the 
>> equipment released and I guess I was hoping there might be someone on here 
>> who has experienced anything similar to this and could offer some advice?
>> 
>> To conclude the equipment is donated, for non commercial use and is being 
>> donated to not-for-profit organisations. There should be a solution!
>> 
>> Oh and we have until Friday. So any help much appreciated! 
> 
> As others have said, the fact that it's non-profit/donated is irrelevant. 
> HMRC will want what's due based on the declaration on the carnet.
> 
> One way around this would have been to declare the goods are only for 
> temporary use in the UK, and you bring them in under Temporary Admission - 
> this is commonly used for loan/demo kit, gear that's on tour, stands, sets, 
> etc., for trade fairs, etc. You are allowed to use the gear for a maximum of 
> 24 months under TA, after which point the kit has to be removed or the duty 
> paid (based on the carnet value at the point of import - as far I can tell), 
> unless an extension for further relief can be granted.
> 
> As far as I can tell, I think you would have had to apply for TA *before* 
> shipping the gear to the UK. There is a possibility that HMRC might be 
> willing to grant retrospective TA, though given how far you've got so far and 
> who you're dealing with they may be unsympathetic.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike

Reply via email to