On 14/01/17 18:08, Adrian Farrel wrote:
believe that it would be an offence under the Act to disclose the fact that
one
had received a retention notice, because that's how they're worded.
You are, I believe, allowed to stop disclosing that you haven't received a
retention notice since stopping such a disclosure is not saying that you have
received one.
So, it would be really cool if people could work with their legal departments
(or not :-) to send out such "we have not" notices on a timer, and then stop
when they do.
I'd understand folk not wanting to do that and appreciate that I don't run a
service provider. But still...
Can retention notices force a provider to explicitly deny their
existence, rather than simply not revealing them?
--
Paul Waring
Freelance consultant
https://www.pwaring.com
