On 17 February 2018 at 10:11, Neil J. McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > Deployed no but just a matter of time - I doubt there are huge latency > benefits that you don’t already see from the current plethora of optimised DC > switches and code that’s available and I’m totally unconvinced that low > buffer solutions are right for anything outside of the DC with today’s OTT > steaming needs mixed with a lot of the access technology in cable, DSL and > FTTP. > > Our requirement is only to run code we know we need to run- simplifies > security risks and stupid bugs in things we don’t use and allows focused > testing and telemetry in the end to end service. >
Hi Neil, Yeah I agree, I'd like to have only the exact features we need running. Also we would be able to test the code in house against our own requirements/standards. I'm also keen on the idea of being able to add counters to anything we want, something the traditional vendors are either reluctant or slow to do. This also opens the possibility of "temporary" counters, if they create a performance hit, we may only need them when troubleshooting. Cheers, James.
