Hi John, Martin,

There are 2 dependencies:

1. The ULC version used by ULCLoad (the ULC client side jars that you have
in your ui/lib dir) has to be the same as that used by the ULC App running
on the server. This is a given, otherwise, you will run into version
mismatch while recording and playing. This means the ULC client side
extension classes must be compiled with the same version of ULC.

2. The Java version used for compiling the classes must also be the same
(this has been the observed behavior).

Thanks and regards,

Janak

-----------------------------------------
Janak Mulani

email: janak.mul...@canoo.com
url: http://www.canoo.com

Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications

http://www.canoo.com/ulc
-----------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com
> [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of
> Prince John, Bedag
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:10 AM
> To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com; Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG
> Subject: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider
>
> Hi Martin, Janak,
>
> I don't think this compiler requirement can be right. I ran
> two of our apps the other day under ULC Load with custom
> Coder Registry Providers, both compiled with java 6 (though
> target and source 1.5).
>
> I could only load the provider when I installed ULC load with
> the same version of ulc as used in the application, though (I
> had to install ulcload twice, once for 2008u4 and once for
> 6.2.3). Might that be the problem?
>
> Best wishes
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com
> [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of
> Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:17 PM
> To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com; ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com
> Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider
>
> Hi Janak,
> thank you so much for answering. Alas I'm puzzled: A collegue
> of mine is testing the same software. He uses ulcload on
> ubuntu where he is able to select the custom coder provider.
> The provider is compiled with java 1.6 target 1.5 and he uses
> ulcload 3.0.1 (I tried the same scenario under windows and it failed).
> Greetings
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com
> [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] Im Auftrag von
> Janak Mulani
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 08:59
> An: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com
> Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Not a matter of luck but somehow your mail from 04.02 did not
> get posted
> on the developer list!
>
> >>>
>       As I have to test an third party application that provides a
> custom client coder registry provider I added on the
> ULCRecoder all given
> jars to the classpath including the one jar containing a custom class
> which subclasses DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider. Unfortunately the
> custom client coder registry provider does not show up in the
> Client Coder
> Registry Provider picklist. With 3.0.1 I tried that on ubuntu
> and there it
> worked but under xp it didn't using identical class-libs. As
> this prevents
> from getting started, I appreaciate any piece of information
> that would
> lead to overcome that frustrating effect.
> >>>
>
> To be able to select coder provider it must be compiled with the same
> javac as that of ULC i.e. Java 1.4.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Janak
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Janak Mulani
>
> email: janak.mul...@canoo.com
> url: http://www.canoo.com <http://www.canoo.com/>
>
> Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications
>
> http://www.canoo.com/ulc
> -----------------------------------------
>
> ________________________________
>
>       From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com
> [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of Sturzenegger
> Martin DFR IT AG
>       Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:03 PM
>       To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com
>       Subject: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder
> registry provider
>
>
>       Hi,
>
>       unluckily I didn't get any response. Does that mean, that nobody
> ever encountered that problem or does that mean nobody cares?
>
>       I'd just love to know
>
>       best regards
>
>       m.
>
>
>
>       ________________________________
>
>               Von: Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG
>       Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2010 09:58
>       An: 'ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com'
>       Betreff: custom client coder registry provider
>
>
>
>       Hi,
>
>       just downloaded evolution copies of ulc-2008-u4 and
> ulcload-3.0.2
> and installed them on windows xp. It went smoothly and ulcload starts
> without any problems.
>
>       As I have to test an third party application that provides a
> custom client coder registry provider I added on the
> ULCRecoder all given
> jars to the classpath including the one jar containing a custom class
> which subclasses DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider. Unfortunately the
> custom client coder registry provider does not show up in the
> Client Coder
> Registry Provider picklist. With 3.0.1 I tried that on ubuntu
> and there it
> worked but under xp it didn't using identical class-libs. As
> this prevents
> from getting started, I appreaciate any piece of information
> that would
> lead to overcome that frustrating effect.
>
>       best regards
>
>       ---------------------------------
>
>       martin sturzenegger
>
>       062 835 10 07
>
>       079 456 24 94
>
>       martin.sturzeneg...@pangea.ch
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ULC-developer mailing list
> ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
> _______________________________________________
> ULC-developer mailing list
> ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
> _______________________________________________
> ULC-developer mailing list
> ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
>
_______________________________________________
ULC-developer mailing list
ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com
http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer

Reply via email to