Hi Janak, heureka, I can see the light aka the custom registryprovider! I put in the jar that I've sent you by itself. and by miracle the provider showed. Then i put in all the rest...
I did a little step-dancing on my desk. But it did not last long: trying to record i get an com.ulcjava.base.client.ConnectorException: Unable to send request. Configured url-string may be wrong: http://test01.ktag.ch/app/grunag-schulung/capgb. HTTP response is: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error even if I'm totally sure the url is correct (browser confirms) I thought of proxy settings but for another project I use jmeter facing the same proxy settings and there there ain't no problem. Any hints? Best regards martin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] Im Auftrag von Janak Mulani Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 16:28 An: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider Hi Martin, I am able to see and choose the CapiClientCoderRegistryProvider after including the jar in classpath lib list in the Recorder screen. See attached. ULCLoad 3.0.2 using both ULC 6.2.2. and ULC 2008 u4 client side jars (in ui/lib dir). Lax file points to the jre bundled with ULCLoad which is version 1.4. All I can suggest is try reinstalling ULCLoad 3.0.2. Thanks and regards, Janak ----------------------------------------- Janak Mulani email: janak.mul...@canoo.com url: http://www.canoo.com Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications http://www.canoo.com/ulc ----------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of > Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 4:11 PM > To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com; ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider > > Hi Janak, > i tried lax.class.path: no success. > Attached you find the jar containing the one class. > Thanks a lot > martin > > nb: next week i'll be out of office (skiing) > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] Im Auftrag von > Janak Mulani > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 15:07 > An: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider > > Hi Martin, > > Can you send me your custom client class? If not the whole > jar, just a jar > containing the class? > > You may try one more thing: add the jar to the classpath in > the lax file > i.e. lax.class.path > > Thanks and regards, > > Janak > > ----------------------------------------- > Janak Mulani > > email: janak.mul...@canoo.com > url: http://www.canoo.com > > Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications > > http://www.canoo.com/ulc > ----------------------------------------- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of > > Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:47 PM > > To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com; ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > > Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > registry provider > > > > Hi Janak, > > thank you so much for helping. > > The jar holding 'MyClientCoderRegistryProvider' is in the > > Library path. > > > > I looked at the lax - file. There it referes to the jre > > included in version 6.2.2 which is of version 1.4.xxx. So i > > tried to replace that entry refering to my jre which is > > 1.6.0_13, but that did not work either. > > > > In ULC Load 3.0.2 UI.lax I put > > lax.nl.current.vm=C:\\Programme\\Java\\jre1.6.0_13\\bin\\java.exe > > > > Everything else you mentioned has been provided. > > What else would you suggest? > > Best regards > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] Im Auftrag von > > Janak Mulani > > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 12:12 > > An: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > > Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > registry provider > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > ULCLoad 3.0.2 requires ULC 6.2.2 or higher. > > > > This means that in the ui/lib dir of ULCLoad you should have > > client side > > jars ulc-applet-client.jar, ulc-base-client.jar, > > ulc-base-trusted.jar and > > ulc-servlet-client.jar from ULC 6.2.2 or higher. > > > > You must ensure that version of ULC used by ULCLoad is the > same as the > > version of ULC used be the ULC Application on the server > > which is going to > > be load tested. > > > > Now the question of choosing the custom client coder registry > > provider: > > > > To be able to choose a custom client side class (such as > > MyClientCoderRegistryProvider extends > > DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider) > > you need to put the the jar file containing this class in > the path of > > ULCLoad i.e. choose and include the jar in the Library list on the > > Recorder screen. > > > > It has been reported sometimes that even if the required jar > > is included > > in the classpath library list, the combobox for client > coder registry > > still does not show the custom client coder registry class > > for selection. > > > > I just tested this with ULCLoad 3.0.2 running with ULC 6.2.2 > > and ULC 2008 > > u4. In both the cases I was able to select the custom client > > side class > > that was compiled with combinations of {ULC 6.2.2, ULC 2008, > > ULC 2008 u3} > > and {Java 5, Java 6}. > > > > However as I said earlier this issue has been reported > > before. So you must > > ensure that: > > > > 1. the custom client side class is compiled with same version > > of ULC that > > is being used by ULCLoad and the ULCApp. > > 2. ULCLoad is running with the same Java version (see > > xxxUI.lax file in > > bin dir) as the one with which the custom client class was compiled. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Janak > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Janak Mulani > > > > email: janak.mul...@canoo.com > > url: http://www.canoo.com > > > > Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications > > > > http://www.canoo.com/ulc > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of > > > Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:01 AM > > > To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com; ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > registry provider > > > > > > Hi Janak, > > > the classes on the serverside are compiled with java 1.6, the > > > ones on the client with java 1.6 target 1.5 > > > the ULC version used ist 6.2.3 > > > could you please name the version of ULCLoad that suits? > > > many thanks in advance > > > regards > > > martin > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] Im Auftrag von > > > Janak Mulani > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2010 09:01 > > > An: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > registry provider > > > > > > Hi John, Martin, > > > > > > There are 2 dependencies: > > > > > > 1. The ULC version used by ULCLoad (the ULC client side jars > > > that you have > > > in your ui/lib dir) has to be the same as that used by the > > > ULC App running > > > on the server. This is a given, otherwise, you will run > into version > > > mismatch while recording and playing. This means the ULC > client side > > > extension classes must be compiled with the same version of ULC. > > > > > > 2. The Java version used for compiling the classes must also > > > be the same > > > (this has been the observed behavior). > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > Janak > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > Janak Mulani > > > > > > email: janak.mul...@canoo.com > > > url: http://www.canoo.com > > > > > > Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications > > > > > > http://www.canoo.com/ulc > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of > > > > Prince John, Bedag > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:10 AM > > > > To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com; Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > > > Subject: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > > registry provider > > > > > > > > Hi Martin, Janak, > > > > > > > > I don't think this compiler requirement can be right. I ran > > > > two of our apps the other day under ULC Load with custom > > > > Coder Registry Providers, both compiled with java 6 (though > > > > target and source 1.5). > > > > > > > > I could only load the provider when I installed ULC load with > > > > the same version of ulc as used in the application, though (I > > > > had to install ulcload twice, once for 2008u4 and once for > > > > 6.2.3). Might that be the problem? > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of > > > > Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:17 PM > > > > To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com; ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > > Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > > registry provider > > > > > > > > Hi Janak, > > > > thank you so much for answering. Alas I'm puzzled: A collegue > > > > of mine is testing the same software. He uses ulcload on > > > > ubuntu where he is able to select the custom coder provider. > > > > The provider is compiled with java 1.6 target 1.5 and he uses > > > > ulcload 3.0.1 (I tried the same scenario under windows and > > > it failed). > > > > Greetings > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > Von: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] Im Auftrag von > > > > Janak Mulani > > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 08:59 > > > > An: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > > Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > > registry provider > > > > > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > > > > > Not a matter of luck but somehow your mail from 04.02 did not > > > > get posted > > > > on the developer list! > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > As I have to test an third party application > that provides a > > > > custom client coder registry provider I added on the > > > > ULCRecoder all given > > > > jars to the classpath including the one jar containing a > > > custom class > > > > which subclasses DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider. > > > Unfortunately the > > > > custom client coder registry provider does not show up in the > > > > Client Coder > > > > Registry Provider picklist. With 3.0.1 I tried that on ubuntu > > > > and there it > > > > worked but under xp it didn't using identical class-libs. As > > > > this prevents > > > > from getting started, I appreaciate any piece of information > > > > that would > > > > lead to overcome that frustrating effect. > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > To be able to select coder provider it must be compiled > > > with the same > > > > javac as that of ULC i.e. Java 1.4. > > > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > > > Janak > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Janak Mulani > > > > > > > > email: janak.mul...@canoo.com > > > > url: http://www.canoo.com <http://www.canoo.com/> > > > > > > > > Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications > > > > > > > > http://www.canoo.com/ulc > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com > > > > [mailto:ulc-developer-ad...@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of > > > Sturzenegger > > > > Martin DFR IT AG > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:03 PM > > > > To: ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > > Subject: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > > > registry provider > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > unluckily I didn't get any response. Does that > mean, that nobody > > > > ever encountered that problem or does that mean nobody cares? > > > > > > > > I'd just love to know > > > > > > > > best regards > > > > > > > > m. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > Von: Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2010 09:58 > > > > An: 'ulc-developer@lists.canoo.com' > > > > Betreff: custom client coder registry provider > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > just downloaded evolution copies of ulc-2008-u4 and > > > > ulcload-3.0.2 > > > > and installed them on windows xp. It went smoothly and > > > ulcload starts > > > > without any problems. > > > > > > > > As I have to test an third party application > that provides a > > > > custom client coder registry provider I added on the > > > > ULCRecoder all given > > > > jars to the classpath including the one jar containing a > > > custom class > > > > which subclasses DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider. > > > Unfortunately the > > > > custom client coder registry provider does not show up in the > > > > Client Coder > > > > Registry Provider picklist. With 3.0.1 I tried that on ubuntu > > > > and there it > > > > worked but under xp it didn't using identical class-libs. As > > > > this prevents > > > > from getting started, I appreaciate any piece of information > > > > that would > > > > lead to overcome that frustrating effect. > > > > > > > > best regards > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > > > martin sturzenegger > > > > > > > > 062 835 10 07 > > > > > > > > 079 456 24 94 > > > > > > > > martin.sturzeneg...@pangea.ch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ULC-developer mailing list > > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > _______________________________________________ > > ULC-developer mailing list > > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > _______________________________________________ > ULC-developer mailing list > ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > _______________________________________________ ULC-developer mailing list ULC-developer@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
