Hi Joy and Jennifer,
At the risk of simplifying this discussion I am going to plunge in and say that 
what we write always has the potential of being read and what we read is always 
written by someone else.  Therefore, there is a strong connection between 
reading and writing.  I have often used writing as a starting point for kids 
who are struggling with reading.  We retell and rewrite familiar stories, use 
stories with patterns as jumping off points for writing new stories, and write 
on familiar topics that the child chooses.  Then, I retype these stories and 
and the child uses them for reading.  Sometimes I ask the child if she or he 
wants to copy the typed text in his neatest handwriting for publication.  
Either way I know this has helped children learn to read.  This is a powerful 
connection that we all need to explore further.  
Elisa 

Elisa Waingort
Grade 2 Spanish Bilingual
Dalhousie Elementary
Calgary, Canada


Joy
I had to think a while before responding to your post. (Dwell in the ideas,  
maybe??? LOL) The reading- writing connection is something I have wondered a 
lot  about, too. Why did so many of my first grade kids learn to write  before 
they learned to read? Why were the strongest readers often the best  writers? 
It was, and still is, something of a mystery.  A few years back, I  was asked 
to teach a graduate level summer course on the reading/writing  connection and 
I said yes...but I was terrified because I didn't feel  I understood the 
mechanics behind it very well myself. I agreed to teach it  because I thought 
it 
would help me come to grips with how the reading/writing  connection worked. 
Well...not enough people signed up for the course, so it was  canceled. I was 
really relieved but also a little  disappointed  and have not really wrestled 
with this topic since then. Your question  challenges me to think about this 
one 
more time, this time in light of  what I have learned about the deep and 
surface structure systems from Ellin and  our discussions on this listserv. 
 
I think you have hit upon something that is important to Ellin's philosophy  
of literacy. I wonder if the reason she changes the names for the aspects of  
reading and writing workshop is because of the strong connection between 
reading  and writing. Think of what the term"composing" lends itself to in 
people's 
 minds. Reading comprehension is really a composition...the meaning we create 
in  our own minds using our background knowledge and the author's words. It 
becomes  a dialogue between you and the author and  just as something you write 
 (like this email) becomes a dialogue between the writer (me)and readers (you 
and  others on the list). The only difference between the two is who 
initiates the  "dialogue;" both are attempts to create meaning using language.
 
In thinking about both the deep and surface structure systems, they are all  
related to language...the use of and the understanding of language. In surface 
 structure--there are the sounds that make up language. You use your  phonics 
to speak, read and to write. You use the lexical system  to remember what 
words look like to read them fluently to understand some  one else's message or 
to recall their spelling to communicate your message.  With semantics...we use 
that system to understand the connotations and  denotations of the words 
authors use...subtle differences in meaning make such a  difference in what we 
understand. And when we write, we choose our words  carefully...trying to 
anticipate what effect they will have in the readers minds  in order to 
communicate 
what we want to say. As we use our comprehension  strategies during reading we 
build our background knowledge which in turn helps  us to write more clearly...
 
Reading reinforces writing and writing reinforces reading because, I am  
thinking, they are both ways to use language. I used to think that reading  was 
receptive language and writing is expressive, but I think that reading is  also 
expressive because of how much of the meaning is constructed in our own  
minds. We don't receive understanding by taking in the author's words...meaning 
 is 
constructed with input from ourselves as the readers. In a fashion, we  are 
writing the text along with the author.  The same with writing---when  we write 
we express our ideas we are anticipating how others will react to and  
understand what we write. We think about how others will be understanding  
it...receptively and write accordingly. Once again, it is a negotiation of 
sorts  
between the writer and the readers.
 
Does this make sense? Just some Fourth of July weekend ponderings. I would  
love to hear what others think...
Jennifer
 
 
 
In a message dated 7/3/2008 6:47:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I'm  wondering about the reading/writing connection. Ellin talks about them  
together in her discussion of the six structure systems. I'd like to explore  
this further. How does reading support writing, and how does writing support  
reading? I've seen this, but would like to understand the mechanics  better.








**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
[email protected]
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
[email protected]
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

Reply via email to