Somewhere Russell Stauffer and Jane Hansen and Bill Martin, Jr. are smiling 
serenely!  Thanks,  Jennifer.  You knocked this one out of the park!!

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 22:00:19 -0400> To: 
> [email protected]> Subject: Re: [Understand] Reading/writing 
> connection> > > Joy> I had to think a while before responding to your post. 
> (Dwell in the ideas, > maybe??? LOL) The reading- writing connection is 
> something I have wondered a > lot about, too. Why did so many of my first 
> grade kids learn to write before > they learned to read? Why were the 
> strongest readers often the best writers? > It was, and still is, something 
> of a mystery. A few years back, I was asked > to teach a graduate level 
> summer course on the reading/writing connection and > I said yes...but I was 
> terrified because I didn't feel I understood the > mechanics behind it very 
> well myself. I agreed to teach it because I thought it > would help me come 
> to grips with how the reading/writing connection worked. > Well...not enough 
> people signed up for the course, so it was canceled. I was > really relieved 
> but also a little disappointed and have not really wrestled > with this topic 
> since then. Your question challenges me to think about this one > more time, 
> this time in light of what I have learned about the deep and > surface 
> structure systems from Ellin and our discussions on this listserv. > > I 
> think you have hit upon something that is important to Ellin's philosophy > 
> of literacy. I wonder if the reason she changes the names for the aspects of 
> > reading and writing workshop is because of the strong connection between > 
> reading and writing. Think of what the term"composing" lends itself to in 
> people's > minds. Reading comprehension is really a composition...the meaning 
> we create > in our own minds using our background knowledge and the author's 
> words. It > becomes a dialogue between you and the author and just as 
> something you write > (like this email) becomes a dialogue between the writer 
> (me)and readers (you > and others on the list). The only difference between 
> the two is who > initiates the "dialogue;" both are attempts to create 
> meaning using language.> > In thinking about both the deep and surface 
> structure systems, they are all > related to language...the use of and the 
> understanding of language. In surface > structure--there are the sounds that 
> make up language. You use your phonics > to speak, read and to write. You use 
> the lexical system to remember what > words look like to read them fluently 
> to understand some one else's message or > to recall their spelling to 
> communicate your message. With semantics...we use > that system to understand 
> the connotations and denotations of the words > authors use...subtle 
> differences in meaning make such a difference in what we > understand. And 
> when we write, we choose our words carefully...trying to > anticipate what 
> effect they will have in the readers minds in order to communicate > what we 
> want to say. As we use our comprehension strategies during reading we > build 
> our background knowledge which in turn helps us to write more clearly...> > 
> Reading reinforces writing and writing reinforces reading because, I am > 
> thinking, they are both ways to use language. I used to think that reading 
> was > receptive language and writing is expressive, but I think that reading 
> is also > expressive because of how much of the meaning is constructed in our 
> own > minds. We don't receive understanding by taking in the author's 
> words...meaning is > constructed with input from ourselves as the readers. In 
> a fashion, we are > writing the text along with the author. The same with 
> writing---when we write > we express our ideas we are anticipating how others 
> will react to and > understand what we write. We think about how others will 
> be understanding > it...receptively and write accordingly. Once again, it is 
> a negotiation of sorts > between the writer and the readers.> > Does this 
> make sense? Just some Fourth of July weekend ponderings. I would > love to 
> hear what others think...> Jennifer> > > > In a message dated 7/3/2008 
> 6:47:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:> > I'm 
> wondering about the reading/writing connection. Ellin talks about them > 
> together in her discussion of the six structure systems. I'd like to explore 
> > this further. How does reading support writing, and how does writing 
> support > reading? I've seen this, but would like to understand the mechanics 
> better.> > > > > > > > > **************Gas prices getting you down? Search 
> AOL Autos for > fuel-efficient used cars. 
> (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)> 
> _______________________________________________> Understand mailing list> 
> [email protected]> 
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org
_________________________________________________________________
It’s a talkathon – but it’s not just talk.
http://www.imtalkathon.com/?source=EML_WLH_Talkathon_JustTalk
_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
[email protected]
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

Reply via email to