Frank wrote:
First of all, that is one of the reasons I work for myself.
Secondly, if you think this never happens, you are more naive than you
let on. Do you honestly believe everything a CEO says publicly about
an employee's departure is true? Please say you don't. Why should this
situation be any different?
According to Jannie Blackwell, one of the conditions of Fenton's
severance package is that he not talk about it, Perhaps *that's* why
he hasn't said anything.
How do you know it's evolving and not over? You're implying you know
something the rest of us do not. Do you?
So we get the cheapest of the debating tactics: "Are you _sure_? Do you
really _know_? How do you _really know_? Couldn't you be _wrong_?"
Jesus, you sound like a freshman who's just read the _Republic_ for the
first time.
All we know is this: Blackwell says that Fenton was offered a severance
package (Could be true or not.). UCD says they're still investigating
the issue ("Investigating".is a broad term: they might've made their
minds up by now, but haven't acted on anything, and they could claim to
be "investigating.") We can speculate all we want about these two
different claims.
But there has been no _official_ word that John Fenton has been fired,
asked to resign, resigned, or been exonerated. As far as the facts are
known right now, Fenton is still an employee of UCD.
As far as I can tell, this is what Tony's been saying, and somehow many
people here fail to grasp this.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
