A "gag order" implies a judge or some other orderer, doesn't it? Wouldn't we
be talking more about a "confidentiality agreement" here, Karen?
By its nature, an agreement is a two-way contract. And although I'm no
lawyer, I'd imagine either side would be prevented from publishing outright
falsehoods about the case at hand, as people are implying UCD is doing.
-- Tony West
----- Original Message -----
From: "KAREN ALLEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [UC] Reality check
I thought John Fenton was under a gag order. If that's the case, he's not
in a position to refute anything.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
