For all I know Villanova, Penn, La Salle, Harvard own and are hosting many
domains which do not carry their names.


On 7/30/07 2:24 PM, "Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's called "purple" because it's a separate domain, Villanova is only hosting
> it. But you already know that, don't you?
> 
> My domain is hosted cruisingforsex.com servers which, in turn, sit in a server
> farm owned by yet another domain. Neither of them is "responsible" for my
> content but, if I were doing something interesting to law enforcement, you can
> bet they'd both be contacted and my domain could easily be removed.
> 
> Frankus
> Sleek. Edgy. Infinitely flexible
> 
> On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Anthony West wrote:
> 
>>   Wilma,
>>  
>>  I don't know. Is Villanova responsible for our content, right now, on
>> UC-list?
>>  
>>  Your second point does make some sense to me. But how to control it? Large
>> universities are mare's nests of email accounts and websites. You can find
>> some pretty bizarre pages on some of them.
>>  
>>  Maybe Kyle's listserve should include some sort of standard disclaimer of
>> university affiliation for walk-ins. Or maybe ....
>>  
>>  While we're on it, how did UC-list come to be called "purple" instead of
>> "villanova"?
>>  
>>  -- Tony West
>>  
>>  
>>>     I don¹t think Penn is sponsoring the group.  What I meant is they are
>>> the owner of the domain in which gives them a certain responsibility for its
>>> content, doesn¹t it.
>>>   
>>>  As for your second point about group credibility, it is rather the
>>> appearance of credibility.  That is to say, if I was looking for a listserv
>>> forum i this area and I ran across the UC Neighbors and saw upenn.edu in its
>>> address, I would probably think if I didn¹t know better that this Neighbors
>>> listserv is affiliated with the university because it is under their domain.
>>>  
>>>   
>>>  If I see a forum under cbsnews.com, or citibank.com or harvard.edu, I would
>>> most likely assume these would under their domains and subject to all
>>> regulations therein.
>>>   
>>>  Wilma
>>  
>>   
> 
> 


Reply via email to