Re: [UC] Penn schoolsYes, magnet schools are open to the entire city with the 
caveat that one meets the qualifications for the program the school offers.


Thanks!  That's what I thought.  But the paper stated 70% from the local area 
and 30% from the city.

I don't know if anyone has found any maps of what they are going to propose or 
if this will be hidden until the last moment.

It seems that this scheme depends on changing the rules for magnet schools and 
I'm starting to get more worried than before.  Now, I'm thinking of the 
precedent.

The special enhanced schools are an attempt to provide an outlet for those kids 
that do manage to qualify.  These have been available for the high achieving 
kids providing an opportunity within the public system.  Are other magnet 
schools now at risk of "partnership" and being made unavailable as new 
catchment areas get drawn around high real estate valued areas?  In other 
words, it will gaurantee slots to wealthy areas and make the competition that 
much more difficult for high achieving kids from poorer areas that need the 
opportunity most.

The open policy is at the heart of public magnet schools.  The opportunity and 
high expectations we were discussing earlier is why we want the availibility of 
magnet schools to allow at least some possibilities in an underfunded system.  

If this rule changing is allowed, will this be the tip of the iceberg.

Thanks again,
Glenn 

 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Wilma de Soto 
  To: Glenn ; Dave Axler ; UnivCity listserv 
  Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:52 PM
  Subject: Re: [UC] Penn schools


  Yes, magnet schools are open to the entire city with the caveat that one 
meets the qualifications for the program the school offers.

  High schools to my knowledge have not been traditionally restricted to an 
immediate residential area.  Rather, they usually accept students who have 
attended one of all the elementary schools/middle schools "feeder schools" in 
the area.  For instance, people who went to Bryant, Huey, Lea, Sayre, (when  it 
was a middle school), Locke, Blankenburg, Barry, Hamilton could ostensibly wind 
up attending West Philly High School.


  On 4/5/08 1:07 PM, "Glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


    Wilma,

    I have another question.  The Phila. magnet schools don't really have a set 
catchment area, or am I wrong?

    I thought that was a big contradiction in the news reports.  I was 
wondering if this was an indication that Penn was going to make some special 
request.

    Remembering the maps when the Sadie Alexander catchment area was drawn, it 
was clear that the boundaries were designed through a consideration of real 
estate value.

    I wondered, what are Penn and Drexel doing by describing a local catchment 
area (70%) for this magnet school?? If a magnet school could draw from the 
entire city, what does this mean?

    Is Penn/Drexel going to actually draw some "unique" catchment district to 
reserve the slots around its holdings?  I couldn't figure out what they were 
trying to pull but something seemed wrong.

    I'll try to find the answer too.  Are magnet schools open to the entire 
city?

    Isn't it nice to engage in real discussions with each other without those 
goofballs distracting everyone with pot shots to make us keep silent?  We've 
got a civil public listserv!

    Thanks,
    Glenn  


      ----- Original Message ----- 
       
      From:  Wilma de  Soto <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
       
      To: Dave Axler <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  ; UnivCity  listserv 
<mailto:[email protected]>  
       
      Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 12:39  PM
       
      Subject: Re: [UC] Penn schools
       

      You're welcome.

      Traditionally, High Schools  don't have catchment areas per se.

      That's why I included Drew and Powel  school maps since they are in the 
immediate vicinity of UC High School.   You can also see Martha Washington, and 
McMichael's areas which are due  north and West of Powel and Drew.

      West Philadelphia HS School's area  would be included in the H. C. Lea 
School's catchment area.


      On  4/5/08 12:25 PM, "Dave Axler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:

       

        Thanks, Wilma. I have a reasonable idea of Penn  Alexander's catchment 
area -- at least enough to know that, though I'm 3.5  blocks from the school, 
my house is not in that area. What I'm hoping  someone can provide -- though 
Tony's earlier post offered some verbal  insight -- is a map showing the 
catchment areas for West Philadelpha HS and  UCHS.

         
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Wilma  de Soto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: Dave Axler  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; UnivCity listserv  
<[email protected]>
        Sent: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:40  am
        Subject: Re: [UC] Penn schools

        Here's a link to the Alexander  School Catchment Area form a Real 
Estate site:

        http://philadelphiarealestatehub.com/blog/catchment/


        On  4/5/08 3:31 AM, "Dave Axler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:

         

          >> The  existance of Penn Alexander is causing its catchment area to 
undergo  gentrification, and that would be increased if UC High became  
"Penn-Assisted High".

          If so, then what explains the gentrification  of the areas outside 
the catchment area, such as the North side of the  4400 block of Sansom, my own 
4400 block of Chestnut, and similar parts of  UC? It can't be the school, since 
the residents don't benefit from it. At  best, Penn Alexander is one of many 
causes of gentrification within its  catchment area.

          Also, high-school students living in Penn  Alexander's catchment area 
would probably* be in the catchment area of  West Philadelphia HS, not 
University City HS. According to the School  District's website, West 
Philadelphia HS and Penn Alexander are both in  the "South" region, while UCHS 
is in the "Restructured/EMO Region".  (Curiously, the site also lists a 
"University of Penn HS", but without any  address. Dunno what that means...)

          *I searched the PSD site to no  avail for catchment maps. If anyone 
knows where to find 'em, or can  otherwise confirm or disprove my supposition, 
go for  it!



          -----Original Message-----
          From:  KAREN ALLEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          To: SH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;  [email protected]
          Sent: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:29 pm
          Subject: RE:  [UC] Penn schools

          > Don't you think that Penn is mainly  interested in getting free 
schooling for their professors and well paid  staff in the neighborhood who 
normally would send their children to  private school? 
          > Sharon
           
          Yes.  
           
          And  also to make Penn's graduate education program more competitive 
by  offering its own student teachers internships in a highly acclaimed  
"urban" elementary school [Penn Alexander], populated by a well-behaved,  
highly motivated, upper middle class student body.  If UC High  becomes a Penn 
partnership school, then Penn can offer its grad students  teaching 
opportunities in a similar "urban" high school, and Penn  Alexander grads will 
have a top-notch neighborhood high school. 

          http://www.gse.upenn.edu/cms/cms.php?id=171
          http://www.upenn.edu/campus/westphilly/pas.html#PAS4


          Although  Penn's website mentions working with Philadelphia public 
schools other  than Penn Alexander, having what amounts to its own elementary 
and high  school gives Penn's Graduate School of Education (GSE) its own "lab". 
This  arrangement accomplishes two goals simultaneously: both the GSE student  
teachers and the Penn Alexander students receive a stellar   education. And the 
GSE has the advantage of not having to waste  precious educational time dealing 
with the social ills that other public  schools have do deal with. 
           
          The  existance of Penn Alexander is causing its catchment area to 
undergo  gentrification, and that would be increased if UC High became  
"Penn-Assisted High". Penn  employees and young people with children will want 
to send their children  to a top-notch public school, and will move to the 
catchment areas, in  turn creating a more upscale neighborhood, in turn 
reversing the public  perception of the neighborhood being dangerous, in turn 
making it easier  for Penn to market the University. Rising property values 
would eventually  force those deemed undesirable out of the area. 
           
          While Penn  is saying that 70% of a new UC High's students would come 
from the  neighborhood, the gentrification that Penn-Assisted High would very 
likely  cause would mean that the "neighborhood" would probably not consist of 
the  same people who live there now. 
           
          Having top-notch public  schools is the obvious ideal, and if Penn 
Alexander and possibly UC High  are such schools, that is wonderful. But these 
schools have to exist  across the board, not just in select neighborhoods for 
select  demographics. The key is creating Penn Alexanders in all of the city  
neighborhoods. 
           
          Motivated, advantaged kids are going to do  well in any event, 
because their parents have the ability and resources to  see that they do.  The 
really hard job is in creating strategies that  will reach disadvantaged kids 
and their families and in doing whatever it  takes to make sure that those kids 
can also take full advantage of the  opportunities those schools present. THAT 
would be world-changing!   Penn, are you up to THAT job?
           
           

           
          =  
           
           

----------------------------------------------------------------------
          Get the MapQuest Toolbar 
<http://www.mapquest.com/toolbar?NCID=mpqmap00030000000003>  , Maps, Traffic, 
Directions  More!  



         
         

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Get the MapQuest Toolbar 
<http://www.mapquest.com/toolbar?NCID=mpqmap00030000000003>  , Maps, Traffic, 
Directions  More!  



       

       

--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG.  
      Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.7/1361 - Release Date: 4/5/2008 
 7:53 AM







------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG. 
  Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.7/1361 - Release Date: 4/5/2008 
7:53 AM

Reply via email to