Wilma,

I'm not sure what you mean by "outspend the 'educational partner'." Penn's contribution to PAS, for instance, is $1,000/pupil/annum; the School District's contribution is, what, $6,000-$9,000? So who runs this budget, in the end -- Penn or the School District? If you've 30 years in this business, I bet you can pass a good judgement.

I don't think it's just "Penn professors" who will not send their kids to "local area high schools" if they can help it. All sorts of Philadelphian parents, from all income levels, are looking for a way out. Thus the charter-school movement. Thus the theme HS movement (I don't think they use "magnet school" jatrgon anymore). This city is popping with working-class, minority-driven charter schools right now. I reserve judgement on this movement; but there it is.

As for the "different ilk" these private partners are seeking ... do you truly think Bill and Melinda Gates spent all that money on the HS of the Future just because they were trying to gentrify West Philadelphia? They're in Seattle, for Pete's sake.

-- Tony West


Wilma de Soto wrote:
That I don’t know, but it seems a bit like a spinoff of the current Private/Public Management/Charter School Educational Ballyhoo Tsunami.

Instead of just usual two-tiered system of either you go to a special high school magnet program, or the Gulag regular school program with the hoi polloi, you have an added twist of financial investment and partnership of private institutions determining public educational policies.

It would seem to me that adds yet another stratum. Either you outspend the ‘educational partner’,which most community associations can’t do, or become absorbed by them.

Anyone who take public transport during the school rush hours (arrival and dismissal times) would probably think as I do that most Penn professors would not send their children to local area high schools with the the population that is there now.

I am not saying they should or should not, only it’s hard for me to visualize these proposals are specifically targeted with those kids in mind. It just doesn’t ring true for me.

I could be wrong but my gut (and nearly 30 years in the business), tells me it’s a different ilk they wish to attract when these sorts of financial investments are made in local schools.


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to