epoch1970;653594 Wrote: > I think this is not good advice. Nested mounts create cascaded failures > if a mount fails. At boot time race conditions can appear, for example > when a specific drive is being checked. > I recommend mounting physical devices to a flat and wide hierarchy like > /mnt. And for the good looks, create a pseudo-hierarchy pointing to it > using symlinks or bind mounts.
I'll do that next server rebuild.. thanks wich is due to happen pretty soon (when i get time) I just have to move one drive one folder up and that goal would be achieved both drives will be flat under media on the server -- Mnyb -------------------------------------------------------------------- Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x MeridianDSP5200 MeridianDSP5200HC 2 xMeridianDSP3100 +Rel Stadium 3 sub. Bedroom/Office: Boom Kitchen: SB3 + powered Fostex PM0.4 Misc use: Radio (with battery) iPad 64gB wifi +3g with iPengHD & SqueezePad ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89910 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
