I'm using it headless. That's what SoA is all about.

I needed a display for debugging only. I managed to get it working
without display. I didn't follow up on it any further.
ssh is therefore sufficient. 

I tried SPDIF earlier. The driver was a mess. 16bit and limited
samplerate support. Not sure if they improved that.
Beside that I wouldn't expect a great SPDIF performance from such a
board anyhow.

PI vs. CT.

It's IMO not about the USB quality. In the beginning my tweaked PI B+/2
sounded better then a stock CT. 
In my case it depends on the tweaking level which of the boards sound
better. I had the CT sitting 
idle (ran as server) for quite some time, because the PI was better.
That changed again. No idea
if that's because improved kernel(-drivers).    
I e.g do full file buffering on the Pi. While the track is playing
there's close to no load (some signalling) on the ethernet.
Therefore the combined ethernet/usb doesn't really hurt. 


Regarding device-tree handling.

Yep. It's not 100% in line with the fex version. It's IMO a step back -
at least from a readability perspective. 
You can change some but not all the features.

Bottom line. I do not intend to make a huge project out of it. For now.
I'm fine.



::: ' Touch Toolbox and more' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com) :::
by soundcheck
------------------------------------------------------------------------
soundcheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34383
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101624

_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix

Reply via email to