paul- wrote: > Taskset is supplied by busybox, which doesn't support that. But you > can install util-linux.tcz That should install the full version of > taskset. > > Be aware that Squeezelite starts 4 threads, and it already launches the > output thread with a Fifo scheduling scheduling priority. You can > change the priority level on the squeezelite commandline. > > CPU3 should be harmless to isolate. I don't think that is going to do > what you want, as I'm pretty sure that spin_locks will still affect all > cores. > > I've been testing an RT kernel, which seems pretty stable. Latencies > are under 75 microseconds under normal squeezelite loads.
Hi Paul, When I check top, one of the cores, mostly core 0 or 2, seems to be doing the heavy lifting: squeezelite, slimserver, ssh, wifi etc is always on the same core. ThatÂ’s how I got the idea of giving squeezelite the love it deserves. I did not detect a sonic penalty or lag with isolcpus and might as well keep it. Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mcduman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66702 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=107352
_______________________________________________ unix mailing list unix@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
