for me release is when: - it has tag in git - is official archive listed in files (in case of sf.net)
i'm fine with moving to github/gitlab which related projects? warning in advance to maintainers of those projects will be enough :) On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:42:30 +0100, Kolja Waschk wrote: > Hi, > > > there plans to release 0.11 soon? > > What exactly are the (real) requirements to name it a "release" rather > than use just a tagged clone/checkout from GIT/SVN? > >> At some point in time, it will be the right time to fork. > > A fork by itself doesn't give you a formal release nor someone who cares > for it. If you or someone else wants to jump in here at sourceforge to > help it, you're welcome. I'd consider that more desirable. > > Changing the site where it is hosted might help the developers who are > better with github, but disturb all the related projects that expect it > at sourceforge. It creates quite a lot of rumble but IMHO few benefits. > Naturally, a move would help getting rid of all unresolved issues in the > tracker at once. Is that wanted? > > Regards, > Kolja > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
