Hi

to github" reply, please
Why not?

I've made a number of posts regarding my opinion on this topic in the past, no need to repeat.

Although from the posts here it seems desired by many to re-base the project somewhere else, there has not been anyone yet who proved really willing to actually do the work and maintain it there. You just keep writing "move to github", like hitting a button on your remote control (and it reaches me as if I'm meant to be the TV set).

For me personally, the move would mean even more effort than I'm willing to spend. I thought a release could be easier made at SF.

Someone booked the github.com/urjtag place, and did nothing
with it. Maybe this is intentional, maybe not.

AFAIK that someone was Mike and uses that place "private", so you can not see whether it is actually in use or not. I tried to contact him last year about it but gave up after getting no replies.

Please go ahead, try to get it, then fill the space there and maintain it. Until then, comments like the following simply do not help:

> Better compile it to markdown and have it displayed by github. I don't
> see the strict need to compile to HTML.

The UrJTAG.txt already is markup, but the project is not on github.

Kolja


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to