Luk,

Thanks for the link, but I am a bit lost.  wso2 offers middleware,
apparently you believe this will help my situation.  If it's not too much,
can you expand?


On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Luk Vervenne <l...@synergetics.be> wrote:

> osgi... see wso2.com
>
> On 31 Mar 2014, at 16:58, Geoffry Roberts <threadedb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have a project for which Accumulo it appears will serve well.
>  However, I have a significant amount of code I want to leverage that runs
> in OSGi.  I don't need for Accumulo itself to be OSGi based but the
> Accumulo client yes.  I see that the Accumulo client uses all the
> dependencies of the Hadoop client and therefore is not OSGi ready at this
> time.  The Hadoop client certainly doesn't do OSGi--I don't think it can
> even spell it :-)--and attempting to make it so starts turning into a sure
> path to a long sojourn through dependency hell.  I know, I've tried.
> >
> > Nonetheless, I would like to ask: Is there any interest in the Accumulo
> world of having an OSGi based client for this otherwise very appealing
> database?
> >
> > Thanks mucho
> > --
> > There are ways and there are ways,
> >
> > Geoffry Roberts
>
>


-- 
There are ways and there are ways,

Geoffry Roberts

Reply via email to