Guillaume, you still having problems or is the performance ok now? I think with tweaking the 110 hops/ms can be upped to at least 500, since you are not touching any indexes except in the beginning. However, that would require to look at the underlying system and do some inspection. Let me know if you are interested in that?
Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Guillaume ALLEE <guillaume.al...@capgemini.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I tried to lower the values by 30% => same and then by 50% => same again. > (MapMemException) > Here is the message.log http://pastebin.com/bvhhZfjZ > > My neo4j.properties looks like that : > > neostore.nodestore.db.mapped_memory=100M > neostore.propertystore.db.arrays.mapped_memory=50M > neostore.propertystore.db.index.keys.mapped_memory=1M > neostore.propertystore.db.index.mapped_memory=1M > neostore.propertystore.db.mapped_memory=500M > neostore.propertystore.db.strings.mapped_memory=200M > neostore.relationshipstore.db.mapped_memory=400M > > Any idea ? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Big-Traverser-perfomance-are-23-rels-per-milliseconds-good-tp3400711p3409259.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
