Guillaume, the memory mapping happens outside the JVM. As such there is no guarantee that you actually have that memory and you need to make sure no other proceses are competing on that, e.g. you browser which might take a large chunk of the memory you have on the machine (5GB-2.2GB for the JVM)
Could you check that you have memory available? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Guillaume ALLEE <guillaume.al...@capgemini.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I tried to lower the values by 30% => same and then by 50% => same again. > (MapMemException) > Here is the message.log http://pastebin.com/bvhhZfjZ > > My neo4j.properties looks like that : > > neostore.nodestore.db.mapped_memory=100M > neostore.propertystore.db.arrays.mapped_memory=50M > neostore.propertystore.db.index.keys.mapped_memory=1M > neostore.propertystore.db.index.mapped_memory=1M > neostore.propertystore.db.mapped_memory=500M > neostore.propertystore.db.strings.mapped_memory=200M > neostore.relationshipstore.db.mapped_memory=400M > > Any idea ? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Big-Traverser-perfomance-are-23-rels-per-milliseconds-good-tp3400711p3409259.html > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
