"Philipp Rotmann, Linksystem Muenchen" wrote:
> > At some point we need to be able to produce documentation
> > in other formats than just HTML, so we'll need some
> > conversion utilities here.
>
> Well...
>
> I'm not sure whether we really want to produce documentation in
> plain HTML, and I'm just as sceptic whether the current features
> of the formatting engine are enough for documentation purposes.
>
> Maybe it would be the better approach to modify Commentext in a
> way that it would be able to work with XML and use the DocBook
> XML DTD. A possibility to lower the learning curve to become an
> editor would be to write a nice application that would convert
> simply formatted text (similar to the Midgard formatting engine,
> with some more features) to the XML format used.
Making Commentext XML-aware and extending its formatting
capabilities are definitely areas ripe for improvement.
Paul N.
http://www.commentext.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
