Hi,

On 05.01.01 (14:55), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IMO: Bad information detracts from good information. We need
> to delete everything that's dated. We've got Marius' rewrite
> of Azman's installation from source. Why is Azman's original
> article still on the site? Probably because there hasn't been
> time to move the document into an archive, if such an archive
> is even needed, I'm doubtful.

There are definitely people outside, who are not only still
running 1.2.x sites, but even installing them (on FreeBSD, for
instance, where someone had quite some problems getting 1.4
compiling and not the time to track those down).

> The Midgard 1.4 manual belongs in Commentext where users and
> developers can submit edits and additions. A non-MPRy decision
> was made, during a meeting with developers employed by Aurora,
> to not allow anyone to edit another person's documents. IMO,
> this goes exactly opposite of MPRy's interests, the spirit of
> Open Source, and the needs of our community.

Well, IMHO every document (or topic, or any meaningful part of
the whole thing) should have his owner(s) who is/are the only
one(s) to edit it. I don't see another solution to keep a
consistent and good writing style throughout the whole manual.
One of the task of those editors would then be to revise and
include the annotations, which could be displayed as comments or
replies (in commentext) until one of the editors has time.

     phr
-- 
Linksystem Muenchen GmbH                          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Schloerstrasse 10                           http://www.link-m.de
80634 Muenchen                              Tel. 089 / 890 518-0
We make the Net work.                       Fax 089 / 890 518-77

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to