Mike, As far as I know, 11.04 hasn't been released yet. Only announced.
Regards, Pierre 2011/7/25 Mike <[email protected]> > Why 10.04 vs 11.04 at this point? 11.04 is way better (blogging > actually works). > > Also, as long as you have gone through the initial trouble of setting > up your own vendor branch (real important) using trunk is feasible. > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Scott Gray <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Just to put out an opposing point of view, I recommend using the latest > stable release and not the trunk. The trunk is susceptible to new bugs > whereas 10.04 is not and in fact has seen nothing but bug fixes for the past > 15 months. So imagine taking the trunk and spending 15 months only fixing > bugs, that is what 10.04 is. Does the trunk have more features? Yes, but in > my opinion you're unlikely to need any of them and if you do you can always > consider back porting the relevant code that you need. > > > > Using the trunk is simply more convenient for committers because they can > commit their changes instead of maintaining patches like everyone else. > Most users don't have that power and if they do submit a patch it is pretty > unlikely it will get committed very quickly. > > > > Regards > > Scott > > > > On 24/07/2011, at 4:45 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > >> Hi Tim, > >> > >> i just tested with the trunk version and followed the following blog: > >> http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=16907 > >> > >> There it is working well. > >> > >> I advice you to use the latest trunk version and not 10.04. Here in > >> Antwebsystems we always use the latest version from svn which in my > >> opinion has the least problems and the most features. > >> If there would be a blocking problem in the latest version, we normally > >> fix that within a couple of hours after reporting. > >> > >> Further, Postgresql is preferred above Mysql seeing the recent takeover > >> by Oracle and the following article: > >> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL:_Comparing_Reliability_and_Speed_in_2007 > >> > >> Regards, > >> Hans > >> > >> > >> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:59 -0700, Tim Stoel wrote: > >>> I have OfBiz 10.04 installed on a local server with MySQL as the > database > >>> engine, we¹ve been working with this for about six months now. We are > >>> intending to use OfBiz for eCommerce, as well as sales order processing > for > >>> eBay orders and have made a lot of progress in adapting it to our > business. > >>> When we installed OfBiz, there is a lot of demo data in the database. > I > >>> wondered what the best way is to deal with this data. When I setup > OfBiz > >>> with only seed data, it seemed a lot of things were not configured that > were > >>> useful, which is why I went back to using all of the demo data. Should > it > >>> be deleted one record at a time manually using another database tool? > What > >>> is the best path to get from an install of OfBiz to using it without > the > >>> excess demo entries? Is there any documentation on this? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Tim > >> > >> -- > >> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >> > > > > >
