It depends on what you mean by "released". The release branch in SVN has was created in April, and now it is "soaking" (if you will).
A binary release of it probably won't be done for a few more months, though really it could be done any time as the goal of the waiting is to get a sub-community formed around it that is using it and getting bug fixes in and such until it is considered of a reasonable quality, and then the binary release is done. -David On Jul 25, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Mike, > > As far as I know, 11.04 hasn't been released yet. Only announced. > > Regards, > > Pierre > > 2011/7/25 Mike <[email protected]> > >> Why 10.04 vs 11.04 at this point? 11.04 is way better (blogging >> actually works). >> >> Also, as long as you have gone through the initial trouble of setting >> up your own vendor branch (real important) using trunk is feasible. >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Scott Gray <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Just to put out an opposing point of view, I recommend using the latest >> stable release and not the trunk. The trunk is susceptible to new bugs >> whereas 10.04 is not and in fact has seen nothing but bug fixes for the past >> 15 months. So imagine taking the trunk and spending 15 months only fixing >> bugs, that is what 10.04 is. Does the trunk have more features? Yes, but in >> my opinion you're unlikely to need any of them and if you do you can always >> consider back porting the relevant code that you need. >>> >>> Using the trunk is simply more convenient for committers because they can >> commit their changes instead of maintaining patches like everyone else. >> Most users don't have that power and if they do submit a patch it is pretty >> unlikely it will get committed very quickly. >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 24/07/2011, at 4:45 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tim, >>>> >>>> i just tested with the trunk version and followed the following blog: >>>> http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=16907 >>>> >>>> There it is working well. >>>> >>>> I advice you to use the latest trunk version and not 10.04. Here in >>>> Antwebsystems we always use the latest version from svn which in my >>>> opinion has the least problems and the most features. >>>> If there would be a blocking problem in the latest version, we normally >>>> fix that within a couple of hours after reporting. >>>> >>>> Further, Postgresql is preferred above Mysql seeing the recent takeover >>>> by Oracle and the following article: >>>> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL:_Comparing_Reliability_and_Speed_in_2007 >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hans >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:59 -0700, Tim Stoel wrote: >>>>> I have OfBiz 10.04 installed on a local server with MySQL as the >> database >>>>> engine, we¹ve been working with this for about six months now. We are >>>>> intending to use OfBiz for eCommerce, as well as sales order processing >> for >>>>> eBay orders and have made a lot of progress in adapting it to our >> business. >>>>> When we installed OfBiz, there is a lot of demo data in the database. >> I >>>>> wondered what the best way is to deal with this data. When I setup >> OfBiz >>>>> with only seed data, it seemed a lot of things were not configured that >> were >>>>> useful, which is why I went back to using all of the demo data. Should >> it >>>>> be deleted one record at a time manually using another database tool? >> What >>>>> is the best path to get from an install of OfBiz to using it without >> the >>>>> excess demo entries? Is there any documentation on this? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >>>> >>> >>> >>
