We stuck with rolling out 10.04 for production use after a lot of debate. What it came down to is the quantity of issues on JIRA for 10.04 vs trunk. You can always upgrade later.
We should be live with 10.04 in about one month. Tim > From: Pierre Smits <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:10:19 +0200 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Best way to remove demo data? > > Mike, > > As far as I know, 11.04 hasn't been released yet. Only announced. > > Regards, > > Pierre > > 2011/7/25 Mike <[email protected]> > >> Why 10.04 vs 11.04 at this point? 11.04 is way better (blogging >> actually works). >> >> Also, as long as you have gone through the initial trouble of setting >> up your own vendor branch (real important) using trunk is feasible. >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Scott Gray <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Just to put out an opposing point of view, I recommend using the latest >> stable release and not the trunk. The trunk is susceptible to new bugs >> whereas 10.04 is not and in fact has seen nothing but bug fixes for the past >> 15 months. So imagine taking the trunk and spending 15 months only fixing >> bugs, that is what 10.04 is. Does the trunk have more features? Yes, but in >> my opinion you're unlikely to need any of them and if you do you can always >> consider back porting the relevant code that you need. >>> >>> Using the trunk is simply more convenient for committers because they can >> commit their changes instead of maintaining patches like everyone else. >> Most users don't have that power and if they do submit a patch it is pretty >> unlikely it will get committed very quickly. >>> >>> Regards >>> Scott >>> >>> On 24/07/2011, at 4:45 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tim, >>>> >>>> i just tested with the trunk version and followed the following blog: >>>> http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=16907 >>>> >>>> There it is working well. >>>> >>>> I advice you to use the latest trunk version and not 10.04. Here in >>>> Antwebsystems we always use the latest version from svn which in my >>>> opinion has the least problems and the most features. >>>> If there would be a blocking problem in the latest version, we normally >>>> fix that within a couple of hours after reporting. >>>> >>>> Further, Postgresql is preferred above Mysql seeing the recent takeover >>>> by Oracle and the following article: >>>> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL:_Comparing_Re >> liability_and_Speed_in_2007 >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hans >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:59 -0700, Tim Stoel wrote: >>>>> I have OfBiz 10.04 installed on a local server with MySQL as the >> database >>>>> engine, we¹ve been working with this for about six months now. We are >>>>> intending to use OfBiz for eCommerce, as well as sales order processing >> for >>>>> eBay orders and have made a lot of progress in adapting it to our >> business. >>>>> When we installed OfBiz, there is a lot of demo data in the database. >> I >>>>> wondered what the best way is to deal with this data. When I setup >> OfBiz >>>>> with only seed data, it seemed a lot of things were not configured that >> were >>>>> useful, which is why I went back to using all of the demo data. Should >> it >>>>> be deleted one record at a time manually using another database tool? >> What >>>>> is the best path to get from an install of OfBiz to using it without >> the >>>>> excess demo entries? Is there any documentation on this? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Tim >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >>>> >>> >>> >>
