Matthew Caron <[email protected]> writes:

(a) i don't always know ahead of time that i might in future want to reference a file by a particular keyword for which i can create a folder and put a symlink in it.

I fail to see why this is a problem. When you want to add the keyword reference, make a new folder. It's like making a new tag.

Creating a new folder isn't the 'problem'. The 'problem' is that i don't always anticipate the keyword which, in future, i'll have in mind when i want to find the file. So i might initially associate the keywords X and Y with a file, and create folders for those keywords; but in the future, i'll be looking for the file via keyword Z, for which i haven't yet created a folder, and so which can't be used as a method of locating the file.

However, i put the word 'problem' in quotes because, of course, this issue applies to tags as well! So i acknowledge that tags here don't get me anything that folders+symlinks don't. It seems to me that what i need for this situation is the ability to do full-document searches - which obviously i can do from the command line with some form of grep-like tool, but which i think would be nice to have in the form of an interface within the oC GUI itself.

(b) This becomes increasingly unwieldy as the number of keywords/tags associated with a given file increases. With tags (e.g. like in Calibre), i simply add a list of tags to a file, and that's that. But let's say i have four tags, for each of which i want to have a folder. Then the file 'officially' lives in one folder, but i have to manually create symlinks to that file in each of the other three folders. (This is not purely theoretical; i have a document indexed by Calibre with the four tags 'behaviour', 'economics', 'gametheory', 'sociology'.)

So, you write a program to do this to make it less tedious. :-)

Yes, i could do that. i'm a developer and sysadmin, and i've written and maintained programs - of various sizes - in Perl5, JavaScript, Emacs Lisp and shell to add functionality to software that was 'missing' in terms of the preferred workflows of both myself and others. But doing so, and maintaining them, takes time and resources away from doing other things, and so if it's possible for the developers/maintainers of a system to create the functionality i'd like, that's my preferred option. In this particular context, if tag-like functionality was added to the oC frontend, which used folders+symlinks as the backend, that would be fine with me. (Although i'm only familiar with *n*x-style platforms, and don't know how practical that approach is on e.g. Win systems.) My primary interest is in having a tag-based frontend, as i've found tags simply too useful to not care whether they're available.


Alexis.
_______________________________________________
User mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.owncloud.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to