Trying to come back to the thread... Mmmmm, I find your opinions founded
and interesting... However still my proposal is not so complex as the level
the discussion reached. Long story short:

   - Automatically tagging (liked the word tag you have been using) assets
   based on the timeline hierarchy everybody shares and,
   - Additionally, if desired and UI/UX aspects prove to be light for the
   end user, asking for a title for the last time period (remember,
   year->season->month->week->day->hour...), to provide a "chapter" view of
   your media (your trip, your visit, your new nephew, your camel ride...).

If possible, I would rely just in file-system abstractions to keep it
simple and interoperable, my impression is that it is feasible.

That is all about it.

Some more opinions about the feature as I just described it?

Thank you very much for your time and interest in advance.

Regards!



2015-03-24 1:54 GMT+01:00 Alexis <[email protected]>:

>
> Matthew Caron <[email protected]> writes:
>
>  (a) i don't always know ahead of time that i might in future want to
>>>  reference a file by a particular keyword for which i can     create a
>>> folder and put a symlink in it.
>>>
>>
>> I fail to see why this is a problem. When you want to add the keyword
>> reference, make a new folder. It's like making a new tag.
>>
>
> Creating a new folder isn't the 'problem'. The 'problem' is that i don't
> always anticipate the keyword which, in future, i'll have in mind when i
> want to find the file. So i might initially associate the keywords X and Y
> with a file, and create folders for those keywords; but in the future, i'll
> be looking for the file via keyword Z, for which i haven't yet created a
> folder, and so which can't be used as a method of locating the file.
>
> However, i put the word 'problem' in quotes because, of course, this issue
> applies to tags as well! So i acknowledge that tags here don't get me
> anything that folders+symlinks don't. It seems to me that what i need for
> this situation is the ability to do full-document searches - which
> obviously i can do from the command line with some form of grep-like tool,
> but which i think would be nice to have in the form of an interface within
> the oC GUI itself.
>
>  (b) This becomes increasingly unwieldy as the number of keywords/tags
>>>  associated with a given file increases. With tags     (e.g. like in
>>> Calibre), i simply add a list of tags to a     file, and that's that. But
>>> let's say i have four tags, for     each of which i want to have a folder.
>>> Then the file     'officially' lives in one folder, but i have to manually
>>>    create symlinks to that file in each of the other three     folders.
>>> (This is not purely theoretical; i have a document     indexed by Calibre
>>> with the four tags 'behaviour',     'economics', 'gametheory', 'sociology'.)
>>>
>>
>> So, you write a program to do this to make it less tedious. :-)
>>
>
> Yes, i could do that. i'm a developer and sysadmin, and i've written and
> maintained programs - of various sizes - in Perl5, JavaScript, Emacs Lisp
> and shell to add functionality to software that was 'missing' in terms of
> the preferred workflows of both myself and others. But doing so, and
> maintaining them, takes time and resources away from doing other things,
> and so if it's possible for the developers/maintainers of a system to
> create the functionality i'd like, that's my preferred option.
> In this particular context, if tag-like functionality was added to the oC
> frontend, which used folders+symlinks as the backend, that would be fine
> with me. (Although i'm only familiar with *n*x-style platforms, and don't
> know how practical that approach is on e.g. Win systems.) My primary
> interest is in having a tag-based frontend, as i've found tags simply too
> useful to not care whether they're available.
>
>
> Alexis.
>
> _______________________________________________
> User mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.owncloud.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
User mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.owncloud.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to