Paul Benedict wrote: >... I am truly happy WebWork >is becoming Struts 2.0 because the action framework, imo, is >the only product that deserves the name "Struts" -- and Shale >should leave the repository for its own pastures. I can't escape >my perception of what Shale is (marketing campaign for JSF) and >so I don't think I'll be leaving my opinion behind soon. > now I'm certainly a nobody in the programming world, but I was talking with a somebody a few days ago (local j2ee guru, lead coder for some open source apps too - and no I'm not going to name him - that's his privacy respected - it was personal advice). i mentioned that i was using traditional struts and that perhaps i should get into jsf/shale, and he remarked "no, stick with core struts. in fact, if you can, move over to using the v2 / webwork version. jsf is not gaining momentum." gosh, now i'm both breaking the "cite your sources" maxim, and backing up some Dakota Jack leads (and I use an anon id!) ... this could get ugly! Moose on the Loose in the Hoose
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
