On 3/30/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dion, you are obviously really green.  Please read a bit and then come
> back.  Do you have any idea about architecture and design and testing
> issues?


Yes, I do. Do you?

So, the use of StrutsTestCase has an effect on architecture and design?
Are you saying you can't test your code using it? I seem to do it reasonably
easily.

On 3/29/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/30/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > God, Joe!  If you don't know what is wrong with Struts 1.x then stand
> > > aside.  For one, try writing decent tests.  Do you test your code?
> >
> >
> >
> > So StrutsTestCase doesn't help you?
> >
> >
> > On 3/29/06, Joe Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jonathon,
> > > >
> > > > You didn't answer Dion's question. You merely summarized that Struts
> > and
> > > > WebWork merged.
> > > > You did not state any technical reasons that Struts 1.x is wrong.
> > > > The question was "Do you have a list of
> > > > things that are technically wrong with Struts 1.x?"
> > > >
> > > > You complain that people don't answer questions on this list and
> look
> > > what
> > > > you've just done.
> > > >
> > > > So do you have an answer?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >You should not use me as some kind of scapegoat to take out your
> > > > >frustrations on. Take this stuff up with the Struts PMC, not
> > > > >with me. >Jonathan Revusky
> > > >
> > > > Very unbecoming of you Jon. Stop trying to change the subject and
> > answer
> > > > the question.The question is:
> > > >
> > > > "Do you have a list of things that are technically wrong with Struts
> > 1.x
> > > ?"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its
> > back."
> > > ~Dakota Jack~
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
> > Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is
> afraid
> > of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
> ~Dakota Jack~
>
>


--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is afraid
of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris

Reply via email to