The versions of the old package names should have a buildid, too:
20110208-0.175.1.0.0.19.0
I think this is what April asked you to get rid of? The reason I'd keep it
is so that should we need to respin those packages for build 19, we can do
so, and have the incorporation be able to tell the difference. Plus all
the other package versions go out to that level. The dependencies
connecting the old and new packages are fine as they are, since optional
and require specify a minimum, not a minimum and a maximum like a
incorporate dependency does.
The comments "Force the dependency on the old package name" don't have much
meaning to someone who doesn't already know why that's there. You should
say "Ensure that we upgrade the old package name to the version where it's
renamed", or something that indicates *why* we're doing this.
You might make a comment in the makefile that the .0 is for the non-+
version, and that a +'ed version (eg, 93u+) should have a 1 in that spot.
For future maintainers.
Thanks,
Danek
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
