Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the Apache Extras repositories are governed by the ASF and the consensus seems to point to SF rather than Github (which would have been my personal preference) or Bitbucket.
Regards, *Raúl Kripalani* Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source Integration specialist http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL <victor.n...@linagora.com> wrote: > I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a good solution? > > After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by implanting adware and > other spyware in installers available to download there. > It became known with the big complain of the Gimp project (that wasn't > even fixed by SourceForge…). > > See > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ > for details. > > Victor > > > Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : > >> Do we not already have volunteers in the current set of contributors for >> the project ? >> I for one is willing in continue maintaining the project once it has been >> moved (where ever it is moved). >> >> I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration. >> >> // Pontus >> >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to the... >>> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing to maintain the >>> project >>> after SourceForge migration. >>> >>> Cheers! >>> >>> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >>> napisał: >>> >>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no. >>>> >>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge >>>> >>> of >>> >>>> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra. >>>> >>>> // Pontus >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey guys, >>>>> >>>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras >>>>> >>>> migration? >>> >>>> Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components... >>>>> >>>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but found no conclusion. >>>>> >>>> Maybe I >>> >>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to get very chatty over >>>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion email. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* >>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source >>>>> Integration specialist >>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | >>>>> >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >>> >>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno is the one in charge >>>>>> >>>>> for >>>> >>>>> the move. >>>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the progress or roadmap. >>>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to be a option in the >>>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. >>>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to the camel-dev >>>>>> >>>>> mailinglist. >>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E >>> >>>> [2] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E >>> >>>> // Pontus >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph Emmersberger < >>>>>> >>>>> cemme...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any date when this move is expected? We have still the >>>>>>> >>>>>> backup >>>> >>>>> plan >>>>>> >>>>>>> with Github in place, ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Diging through the community development list shows that it will >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> be >>> >>>> moved >>>>>> >>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache extra. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser >>> >>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apache >>> >>>> community >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> // Pontus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html >>> >>>> [2] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html >>> >>>> [3] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community >>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only >>>>>>>>>> (https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I >>> >>>> wondered >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>> Henryk Konsek >>> http://about.me/hekonsek >>> >>> > -- > > > Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et supportée > par Linagora. > Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. > http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com >
