IMHO SourceForge is a piece of crap that has never been anywhere near the "good solution" ;) .
Cheers! pt., 4.09.2015 o 15:22 użytkownik Victor NOËL <victor.n...@linagora.com> napisał: > I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a good solution? > > After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by implanting adware > and other spyware in installers available to download there. > It became known with the big complain of the Gimp project (that wasn't > even fixed by SourceForge…). > > See > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ > for details. > > Victor > > Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : > > Do we not already have volunteers in the current set of contributors for > > the project ? > > I for one is willing in continue maintaining the project once it has been > > moved (where ever it is moved). > > > > I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration. > > > > // Pontus > > > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to the... > >> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing to maintain the > project > >> after SourceForge migration. > >> > >> Cheers! > >> > >> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> > >> napisał: > >> > >>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no. > >>> > >>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in charge > >> of > >>> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra. > >>> > >>> // Pontus > >>> > >>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hey guys, > >>>> > >>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras > >> migration? > >>>> Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components... > >>>> > >>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but found no conclusion. > >> Maybe I > >>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to get very chatty > over > >>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion email. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> *Raúl Kripalani* > >>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open > Source > >>>> Integration specialist > >>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno is the one in charge > >>> for > >>>>> the move. > >>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the progress or roadmap. > >>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to be a option in the > >>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. > >>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to the camel-dev > >>>> mailinglist. > >>>>> [1] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E > >>>>> [2] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E > >>>>> // Pontus > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph Emmersberger < > >>> cemme...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Is there any date when this move is expected? We have still the > >>> backup > >>>>> plan > >>>>>> with Github in place, ... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> Diging through the community development list shows that it will > >> be > >>>>> moved > >>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache extra. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser > >>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the > >> Apache > >>>>>>> community > >>>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this > >>>>>> discussion > >>>>>>>> yet. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>> > >> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html > >>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>> > >> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html > >>>>>>>> [3] > >>>>>>>> > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < > >> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only > >>>>>>>>> (https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) > >> I > >>>>>> wondered > >>>>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Tim > >>>>>>>>> > >> -- > >> Henryk Konsek > >> http://about.me/hekonsek > >> > > -- > > > Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et > supportée par Linagora. > Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. > http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com > -- Henryk Konsek http://about.me/hekonsek
