Victor and David: You are welcome to join the com-dev mailing list and enlighten them. Here is a link the latest answer on that question :-)
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201507.mbox/%3CBY2PR03MB490B6943E12F5D925203A2E99900%40BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E // Pontus On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 16:01 David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not github? > 4. sep. 2015 3:54 p.m. skrev "Victor NOËL" <victor.n...@linagora.com>: > > > Are they even aware of the problem with sourceforge? > > Maybe someone that is known there (such as a member of an Apache Project > > ;) could tell them before they take the wrong decision? > > > > It's even worse than what I thought because after the Gimp people told SF > > to stop doing their shady things, they actually insisted during 2015: > > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html > > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html > > > > Victor > > > > Le 04/09/2015 15:36, Raul Kripalani a écrit : > > > >> Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the Apache Extras > >> repositories are governed by the ASF and the consensus seems to point to > >> SF > >> rather than Github (which would have been my personal preference) or > >> Bitbucket. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> *Raúl Kripalani* > >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source > >> Integration specialist > >> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL <victor.n...@linagora.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a good solution? > >>> > >>> After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by implanting adware > >>> and > >>> other spyware in installers available to download there. > >>> It became known with the big complain of the Gimp project (that wasn't > >>> even fixed by SourceForge…). > >>> > >>> See > >>> > >>> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ > >>> for details. > >>> > >>> Victor > >>> > >>> > >>> Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : > >>> > >>> Do we not already have volunteers in the current set of contributors > for > >>>> the project ? > >>>> I for one is willing in continue maintaining the project once it has > >>>> been > >>>> moved (where ever it is moved). > >>>> > >>>> I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration. > >>>> > >>>> // Pontus > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to the... > >>>>> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing to maintain the > >>>>> project > >>>>> after SourceForge migration. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers! > >>>>> > >>>>> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com > > > >>>>> napisał: > >>>>> > >>>>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in > >>>>>> charge > >>>>>> > >>>>>> of > >>>>> > >>>>> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hey guys, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> migration? > >>>>>> Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components... > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but found no conclusion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Maybe I > >>>>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to get very chatty > >>>>>> over > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion email. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* > >>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open > >>>>>>> Source > >>>>>>> Integration specialist > >>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno is the one in > charge > >>>>>>> for > >>>>>>> the move. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the progress or roadmap. > >>>>>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to be a option in > the > >>>>>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. > >>>>>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to the camel-dev > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> mailinglist. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E > >>>>> > >>>>> [2] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E > >>>>> > >>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph Emmersberger < > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> cemme...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Is there any date when this move is expected? We have still the > >>>>>>>> backup > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> plan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> with Github in place, ... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren < > ullg...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Diging through the community development list shows that it will > >>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> moved > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache extra. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> community > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> discussion > >>>>>>>>>> yet. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html > >>>>> > >>>>> [2] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html > >>>>> > >>>>> [3] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> (https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> wondered > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Tim > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Henryk Konsek > >>>>> http://about.me/hekonsek > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>> > >>> > >>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et > supportée > >>> par Linagora. > >>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. > >>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com > >>> > >>> > > -- > > > > > > Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et supportée > > par Linagora. > > Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. > > http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com > > >
