Why not github? 4. sep. 2015 3:54 p.m. skrev "Victor NOËL" <victor.n...@linagora.com>:
> Are they even aware of the problem with sourceforge? > Maybe someone that is known there (such as a member of an Apache Project > ;) could tell them before they take the wrong decision? > > It's even worse than what I thought because after the Gimp people told SF > to stop doing their shady things, they actually insisted during 2015: > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html > > Victor > > Le 04/09/2015 15:36, Raul Kripalani a écrit : > >> Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the Apache Extras >> repositories are governed by the ASF and the consensus seems to point to >> SF >> rather than Github (which would have been my personal preference) or >> Bitbucket. >> >> Regards, >> >> *Raúl Kripalani* >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source >> Integration specialist >> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL <victor.n...@linagora.com> >> wrote: >> >> I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a good solution? >>> >>> After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by implanting adware >>> and >>> other spyware in installers available to download there. >>> It became known with the big complain of the Gimp project (that wasn't >>> even fixed by SourceForge…). >>> >>> See >>> >>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ >>> for details. >>> >>> Victor >>> >>> >>> Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : >>> >>> Do we not already have volunteers in the current set of contributors for >>>> the project ? >>>> I for one is willing in continue maintaining the project once it has >>>> been >>>> moved (where ever it is moved). >>>> >>>> I think the question right now is the progress of the SF migration. >>>> >>>> // Pontus >>>> >>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek <hekon...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are being moved to the... >>>>> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing to maintain the >>>>> project >>>>> after SourceForge migration. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers! >>>>> >>>>> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >>>>> napisał: >>>>> >>>>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev mailing list no. >>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that seems to be in >>>>>> charge >>>>>> >>>>>> of >>>>> >>>>> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra. >>>>>> >>>>>> // Pontus >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about the Apache Extras >>>>>>> >>>>>>> migration? >>>>>> Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras components... >>>>>> >>>>>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but found no conclusion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe I >>>>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to get very chatty >>>>>> over >>>>>> >>>>>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion email. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* >>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open >>>>>>> Source >>>>>>> Integration specialist >>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno is the one in charge >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> the move. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the progress or roadmap. >>>>>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to be a option in the >>>>>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. >>>>>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to the camel-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> mailinglist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E >>>>> >>>>> [2] >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E >>>>> >>>>> // Pontus >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph Emmersberger < >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cemme...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any date when this move is expected? We have still the >>>>>>>> backup >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> plan >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> with Github in place, ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Diging through the community development list shows that it will >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> moved >>>>>> >>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache extra. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] and the >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> community >>>>>> >>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any conclusion on this >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html >>>>> >>>>> [2] >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html >>>>> >>>>> [3] >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to switch to read only >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wondered >>>>>> >>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tim >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Henryk Konsek >>>>> http://about.me/hekonsek >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> >>> >>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et supportée >>> par Linagora. >>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. >>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com >>> >>> > -- > > > Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et supportée > par Linagora. > Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise. > http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com >
