Hi Tejas, Please check that your xenserver host copied with 'vhd-util' binary. Also check the /var/log/SMLog in the host for more detailed logs for this error.
Thanks, Jayapal On 26-Nov-2014, at 9:51 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > ISSUE!!!!!!! > we are not using security groups but still bridge is configured. Zone is > created sucessfully but System VMs are not able to start. follwoing error > we are getting. > > 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) can not create vdi in sr > 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) Catch Exception > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr > 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) destoryVDIbyNameLabel failed due to there > are 0 VDIs with name cloud-f4f8ad12-b315-4768-9e71-278041d6bb80 > 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) can not create vdi in sr > 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] > (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) Catch Exception > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr > 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 > 2014-11-26 21:43:31,564 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl] > (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to acquire lock on VMTemplateStoragePool > 24 > 2014-11-26 21:43:31,567 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Failed to start instance > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-6-VM] > 2014-11-26 21:43:31,802 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped > with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null > host id before state transition: 2 > 2014-11-26 21:43:31,825 WARN [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Exception while trying to start secondary > storage vm > com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is > unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null > 2014-11-26 21:43:31,828 INFO [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to start secondary storage vm for > standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 6, will recycle it and start a new > one > > 2014-11-26 21:45:31,516 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:ctx-6761d068) Failed to start instance > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-10-VM] > 2014-11-26 21:46:01,499 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] > (secstorage-1:ctx-1085a3ab) Failed to start instance > VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-11-VM] > > > is it because of bridge configuration?? > > We are using FC storage and we have mounted primary storage using presetup > storage. HA is not configured on xenserver. > what are the possible cause of above mentioned issue? > > Thanks in advance > Tejas > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We are getting following error: >> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] >> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) can not create vdi in sr >> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 >> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] >> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) Catch Exception >> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to >> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr >> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 >> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] >> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) destoryVDIbyNameLabel failed due to there >> are 0 VDIs with name cloud-f4f8ad12-b315-4768-9e71-278041d6bb80 >> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] >> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) can not create vdi in sr >> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 >> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor] >> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) Catch Exception >> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to >> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr >> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70 >> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,564 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl] >> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to acquire lock on VMTemplateStoragePool >> 24 >> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,567 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] >> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Failed to start instance >> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-6-VM] >> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,802 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl] >> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped >> with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null >> host id before state transition: 2 >> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,825 WARN [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] >> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Exception while trying to start secondary >> storage vm >> com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is >> unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null >> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,828 INFO [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] >> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to start secondary storage vm for >> standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 6, will recycle it and start a new >> one >> >> >> is it related to bridge configuration???? >> >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: >> >>> No, in Advanced Zone with SG - just like in Basic zone - there is no per >>> customer VLAN; there are no firewall, load balancer or additional NICs; >>> there is also no IPv6. >>> >>> A VM will just get a public IP via DHCP and that's it, the customers are >>> isolated via "security groups" which is a fancy name for iptables rules. >>> >>> Hope this clears it up. >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>> >>> Nux! >>> www.nux.ro >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Tejas Sheth" <tshet...@gmail.com> >>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 10:14:11 >>>> Subject: Re: security group and xenserver query >>> >>>> Thanks for simplification, >>>> so it means that each account will have seprate VLAN with its own >>> subnet >>>> and those VLANs will be created and configured in physical switch? >>>> >>>> if architecture is above mentioned way configured then how can we >>> achieve >>>> NAT and loadbalancing? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Tejas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Geoff Higginbottom < >>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I like to think of Advanced Network with SG as simply multiple Basic >>>>> Networks, each on its own VLAN. You have the same features (or rather >>> lack >>>>> of) as you would with a Basic Zone, but you have multiple Guest >>> Networks. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Geoff Higginbottom >>>>> >>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 >>>>> >>>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:tshet...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: 26 November 2014 09:53 >>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: security group and xenserver query >>>>> >>>>> so NAT and loadbalancers are not possible if we use security group? >>>>> >>>>> so it meanse there will be no internal and external IPs for VMs. is it >>>>> correct? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < >>>>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> For SG networks there is no public network. >>>>>> We configure public ips for the guest network. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jayapal >>>>>> >>>>>> On 26-Nov-2014, at 12:00 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have made the bridge configuration, but when i am selecting >>>>>>> advance zone. it is not showing public network configuration. only >>>>>>> guest and management is availabel. also internal CIDR ip >>>>>>> configuration is also not available. >>>>>>> i think it is cinverting to basic zone if we select security group >>>>>>> and xenserver as hypervisor. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> Tejas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi < >>>>>>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For 6.2 you no need to install CSP. My typo mistake in last mail. >>>>>>>> sysctl.conf is fine. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Jayapal >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 25-Nov-2014, at 8:45 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So can i take it as confirmation and proceed with only following >>>>>>>>> bridge configuration in xenserver 6.2? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # xe-switch-network-backend bridge >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # vi /etc/sysctl.conf >>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1 >>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0 >>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Require confirmation for sysctl.cnf configuration part. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, >>>>>>>>> Tejas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk < >>>>>>>> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> XenServer does not need any package to be expicitly installed. >>>>>>>>>> When >>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>> add host to CS it copies some files to the host itself and you >>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>>> to bother about them usually. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vadim. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:tshet...@gmail.com] >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:52 PM >>>>>>>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> Subject: security group and xenserver query >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello Jayapal, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reply, I have understood the bridge configuration >>> part >>>>>>>>>> but can you clarify CSP package part. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> if CSP package comes with xenserver 6.2 then do we need to >>>>>>>>>> install it explicitly? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It would be really helpful if you can send link to install CSP >>> in >>>>>>>>>> xenserver 6.2 because CS 4.3 document do not have description >>> for >>>>>>>> xenserver >>>>>>>>>> 6.2 CSP installation. >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> Hi Tejas, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The network mode set to 'bridge' mode. >>>>>>>>>> #xe-switch-network-backend bridge >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think Xenserver 6.2 comes with the CSP package, so you need to >>>>>> install >>>>>>>>>> it explicitly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Jayapal >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 25-Nov-2014, at 4:47 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We are configuring advanced zone in cloudstack 4.3 in xenserver >>>>> 6.2. >>>>>>>>>>> we want to configure security group in advance zone. do we have >>>>>>>>>>> to do any special configuration in xenserver 6.2. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> xenserver has default networking configuration. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Tejas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related >>> services >>>>> >>>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build< >>>>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> >>>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework< >>> http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> >>>>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> >>>>> CloudStack Software Engineering< >>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> >>>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support< >>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> >>>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< >>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>>> >>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are >>> intended >>>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any >>> views or >>>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not >>> necessarily >>>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not >>> the >>>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action >>> based >>>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the >>> sender >>>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd >>> is a >>>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP >>> is a >>>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape >>> Blue >>>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in >>> Brasil >>>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty >>> Ltd is >>>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded >>> under >>>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >>> >> >>
