Is the first added primary storage removed from the host ?
If it is not removed and trying to added again it will fail.
You can delete it using the xencenter or xsconsole.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 26-Nov-2014, at 11:04 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> initially storage gave error while creating zone after we added vhd-util
> so after it got attached. then we tried to reconfigure new zone with
> another pool after changing network bridge to openvswitch but still the
> same issue.
>
> follwoing is the error for SMlog
>
> Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] ['/usr/sbin/vgs', '--noheadings',
> '--nosuffix', '--units', 'b',
> 'VG_XenStorage-4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70']
> Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] pread SUCCESS
> Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] ['/usr/sbin/vgs', '--noheadings',
> '--nosuffix', '--units', 'b',
> 'VG_XenStorage-4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70']
> Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SM: [4051] pread SUCCESS
> Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SMGC: [4051] No work, exiting
> Nov 26 22:11:15 cloud-host1 SMGC: [4051] SR 4436 ('CloudStore-1') (2 VDIs
> in 2 VHD trees): no changes
> Nov 26 22:11:24 cloud-host1 SM: [4154] ['bash',
> '/opt/cloud/bin/copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage.sh',
> '10.3.4.40:/ibm/share1/template/tmpl/1/1/',
> '4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70',
> 'cloud-63ae2d9b-23ce-49cc-8b25-b534a3cf0451']
> Nov 26 22:11:24 cloud-host1 SM: [4154] pread SUCCESS
> Nov 26 22:11:25 cloud-host1 SM: [4186] ['bash',
> '/opt/cloud/bin/kill_copy_process.sh', '']
> Nov 26 22:11:25 cloud-host1 SM: [4186] pread SUCCESS
>
> thanks
> Tejas
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tejas,
>>
>> Please check that your xenserver host copied with 'vhd-util' binary.
>> Also check the /var/log/SMLog in the host for more detailed logs for this
>> error.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jayapal
>>
>> On 26-Nov-2014, at 9:51 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> ISSUE!!!!!!!
>>> we are not using security groups but still bridge is configured. Zone is
>>> created sucessfully but System VMs are not able to start. follwoing error
>>> we are getting.
>>>
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) can not create vdi in sr
>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) Catch Exception
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr
>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) destoryVDIbyNameLabel failed due to there
>>> are 0 VDIs with name cloud-f4f8ad12-b315-4768-9e71-278041d6bb80
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) can not create vdi in sr
>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) Catch Exception
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to
>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr
>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,564 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to acquire lock on
>> VMTemplateStoragePool
>>> 24
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,567 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Failed to start instance
>>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-6-VM]
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,802 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped
>>> with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null
>>> host id before state transition: 2
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,825 WARN [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Exception while trying to start secondary
>>> storage vm
>>> com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is
>>> unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null
>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,828 INFO [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to start secondary storage vm for
>>> standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 6, will recycle it and start a new
>>> one
>>>
>>> 2014-11-26 21:45:31,516 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-6761d068) Failed to start instance
>>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-10-VM]
>>> 2014-11-26 21:46:01,499 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-1085a3ab) Failed to start instance
>>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-11-VM]
>>>
>>>
>>> is it because of bridge configuration??
>>>
>>> We are using FC storage and we have mounted primary storage using
>> presetup
>>> storage. HA is not configured on xenserver.
>>> what are the possible cause of above mentioned issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> Tejas
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are getting following error:
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) can not create vdi in sr
>>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:26,763 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>>> (DirectAgent-97:ctx-861d1d2e) Catch Exception
>>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to
>>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in
>> sr
>>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) destoryVDIbyNameLabel failed due to there
>>>> are 0 VDIs with name cloud-f4f8ad12-b315-4768-9e71-278041d6bb80
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) can not create vdi in sr
>>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:29,612 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.XenServerStorageProcessor]
>>>> (DirectAgent-154:ctx-26ef19d8) Catch Exception
>>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException for template + due to
>>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in
>> sr
>>>> 4436b39f-2d6b-d0ab-9074-f56daefd2f70
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,564 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl]
>>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to acquire lock on
>> VMTemplateStoragePool
>>>> 24
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,567 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Failed to start instance
>>>> VM[SecondaryStorageVm|s-6-VM]
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,802 DEBUG [c.c.c.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) VM state transitted from :Starting to
>> Stopped
>>>> with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id: null
>>>> host id before state transition: 2
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,825 WARN [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Exception while trying to start secondary
>>>> storage vm
>>>> com.cloud.exception.AgentUnavailableException: Resource [Host:2] is
>>>> unreachable: Host 2: Unable to start instance due to null
>>>> 2014-11-26 21:43:31,828 INFO [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>>>> (secstorage-1:ctx-be9596e4) Unable to start secondary storage vm for
>>>> standby capacity, secStorageVm vm Id : 6, will recycle it and start a
>> new
>>>> one
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> is it related to bridge configuration????
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, in Advanced Zone with SG - just like in Basic zone - there is no
>> per
>>>>> customer VLAN; there are no firewall, load balancer or additional NICs;
>>>>> there is also no IPv6.
>>>>>
>>>>> A VM will just get a public IP via DHCP and that's it, the customers
>> are
>>>>> isolated via "security groups" which is a fancy name for iptables
>> rules.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope this clears it up.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nux!
>>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Tejas Sheth" <tshet...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 10:14:11
>>>>>> Subject: Re: security group and xenserver query
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for simplification,
>>>>>> so it means that each account will have seprate VLAN with its own
>>>>> subnet
>>>>>> and those VLANs will be created and configured in physical switch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if architecture is above mentioned way configured then how can we
>>>>> achieve
>>>>>> NAT and loadbalancing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Tejas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Geoff Higginbottom <
>>>>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like to think of Advanced Network with SG as simply multiple Basic
>>>>>>> Networks, each on its own VLAN. You have the same features (or rather
>>>>> lack
>>>>>>> of) as you would with a Basic Zone, but you have multiple Guest
>>>>> Networks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:tshet...@gmail.com]
>>>>>>> Sent: 26 November 2014 09:53
>>>>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: security group and xenserver query
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so NAT and loadbalancers are not possible if we use security group?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so it meanse there will be no internal and external IPs for VMs. is
>> it
>>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
>>>>>>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For SG networks there is no public network.
>>>>>>>> We configure public ips for the guest network.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Jayapal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26-Nov-2014, at 12:00 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have made the bridge configuration, but when i am selecting
>>>>>>>>> advance zone. it is not showing public network configuration. only
>>>>>>>>> guest and management is availabel. also internal CIDR ip
>>>>>>>>> configuration is also not available.
>>>>>>>>> i think it is cinverting to basic zone if we select security group
>>>>>>>>> and xenserver as hypervisor.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Tejas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
>>>>>>>>> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For 6.2 you no need to install CSP. My typo mistake in last mail.
>>>>>>>>>> sysctl.conf is fine.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Jayapal
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 25-Nov-2014, at 8:45 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So can i take it as confirmation and proceed with only following
>>>>>>>>>>> bridge configuration in xenserver 6.2?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # xe-switch-network-backend bridge
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # vi /etc/sysctl.conf
>>>>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1
>>>>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
>>>>>>>>>>> net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables = 1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Require confirmation for sysctl.cnf configuration part.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Tejas
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
>>>>>>>>>> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> XenServer does not need any package to be expicitly installed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> When
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> add host to CS it copies some files to the host itself and you
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>> to bother about them usually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Vadim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:tshet...@gmail.com]
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:52 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: security group and xenserver query
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Jayapal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reply, I have understood the bridge configuration
>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>>>>> but can you clarify CSP package part.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> if CSP package comes with xenserver 6.2 then do we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>> install it explicitly?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be really helpful if you can send link to install CSP
>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> xenserver 6.2 because CS 4.3 document do not have description
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> xenserver
>>>>>>>>>>>> 6.2 CSP installation.
>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tejas,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The network mode set to 'bridge' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>> #xe-switch-network-backend bridge
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think Xenserver 6.2 comes with the CSP package, so you need to
>>>>>>>> install
>>>>>>>>>>>> it explicitly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jayapal
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25-Nov-2014, at 4:47 PM, Tejas Sheth <tshet...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are configuring advanced zone in cloudstack 4.3 in xenserver
>>>>>>> 6.2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to configure security group in advance zone. do we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do any special configuration in xenserver 6.2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> xenserver has default networking configuration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tejas
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>>>>> services
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
>>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>>>>>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<
>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>>>>>>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>>>>>>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
>>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>>>>>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>>>>>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
>>>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>>>> intended
>>>>>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
>>>>> views or
>>>>>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>>>>> necessarily
>>>>>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are
>> not
>>>>> the
>>>>>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
>>>>> based
>>>>>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
>>>>> sender
>>>>>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd
>>>>> is a
>>>>>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
>>>>> is a
>>>>>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from
>> Shape
>>>>> Blue
>>>>>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
>>>>> Brasil
>>>>>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty
>>>>> Ltd is
>>>>>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded
>>>>> under
>>>>>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
