Hi Drew, all,
Andrew Jensen wrote:
Cor Nouws wrote:
Maybe at [email protected] ?
Also some noise once in a while, but not that much trafic. And less
people who just pass there for step-in questions.
Greetings,
Well, I just went to the archive for [EMAIL PROTECTED] It appears
that I am late to the party when it comes to this subject, ( rather the
story of my life I am afraid ) but better late then never. I will put my
thoughts about features out there first.
Just another thought about our how-the-direction-is-directed discussion.
If it is done on discuss@, is it (fairly) sure that people from
QA/development read, participate, take notice?
I haven't seen much examples in the past two years of subjects on that
list, that were promoted in the product's direction.
Maybe I just missed them.
But on the other hand, QA-ers/developers will be careful in spending
their valuable time. And since there are lengthy discussions on broad
and long side-paths, or about minuscule details, now and then, that
might easilly discourage them....
So: does it (searching for improvements in the process and
communication) have impact to discuss further on discuss@ :-)
Nice catch Cor.
My pleasure.
Greetings,
Cor
--
Cor Nouws
www.nouenoff.nl - www.bsooo.nl - http://nl.openoffice.org
Open. For business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
