On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:25 -0700 Ken Springer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe there should be a queue, and fixed on a FIFO basis. That would be a terrible idea, at least without some prioritisation. Otherwise you'd have periods of just catching up on myriad small bugs while big issues languish. > But, if you can't/won't/don't get all of the bugs squashed with the > resources you have, then you need to step back and reassess the > situation. Why? Why must absolutely *all* the bugs be squashed before you continue? Then there'd probably be no forward progress and we'd have a bunch of people complaining about LO being years behind everything else, and nobody would be using it. > As I said earlier, it's better to do a few things well, than a lot of > things poorly. Then, by definition, you don't want an office suite... -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
