-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Apr 23 2002 09:14 -0400, Nathan Lutchansky wrote:

> I beg implementors, please don't add a workaround for this!  As soon as
> resolvers begin to work around it, the problem becomes permanent.
> Unfortunately, if a workaround gets added to Microsoft's resolver, we'll
> all have to follow suit.  :-(  -Nathan

Actually this is a good point? Does anyone know if the IPv6-enabled
Windows resolvers cope with this?

Sorry I haven't been following the thread very closely - if this has
already been mentioned, please feel free to tell me so off list.


Michael Kj�rling

- -- 
Michael Kj�rling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4   \/
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e

``And indeed people sometimes speak of man's "bestial" cruelty, but
this is very unfair and insulting to the beasts: a beast can never be
so cruel as a man, so ingeniously, so artistically cruel.''
(Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE8xYQqKqN7/Ypw4z4RAsUrAJ9cCfZhPVV0JSy7iH9qlMTJeCC+uwCgn6RX
llXTEYqzxCybIlUQnGGgT7Y=
=lHd+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The IPv6 Users Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe users" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to