Sorry I did mistake in previous email, I used string like this

 ->  (?x  http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FavioriteLeague

"FACup" and it gives error.

The string value in rule I found on web from link below: he used rules like

[rule: (?S rdf:type data:serveur), (?S data:identifiant-reseau
"POLO")-> (?S data:newproperty "TEST")]


http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24649785/jena-rules-test-a-literal-property-to-string



On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:09 PM, neha gupta <neha.bang...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes Andy, I tried this and it flushed an error message. Thats why I asked
> it if it is possible and if yes, in what way we can use the String in rule.
>
> + " ->  (?x  http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FavioriteLeague
>
> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#
> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup>"FACup"
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 13/01/17 13:36, neha gupta wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Lorenz, I am sorry.
>>>
>>> Can we use FACup as string rather than a resource.
>>>
>>
>> Have you tried this?
>>
>> You are asking something you can debug locally.
>>
>> I mean it is also
>>> possible, if allowed by rules, that we use something like this
>>>
>>> (?x http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://
>>> www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team) "
>>>
>>>  + "( ?x http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals  ?goals )" +
>>>
>>>         "greaterThan(?goals,30)
>>>          + " ->  (?x  http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FavioriteLeague
>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#
>>> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup>"FACup"
>>>
>>> )]";
>>>
>>> FACup, ChampLeague etc are just some plain strings.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Lorenz Buehmann <
>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Again, you ignored my suggestion to UPLOAD THE WHOLE ONTOLOGY and SHOW
>>>> US THE WHOLE RULE that does not work.
>>>>
>>>> Not having an individual FACup in your ontology is not really an
>>>> explanation for me that a property will be rendered as annotation
>>>> property in Protege after rule execution and storing the data with Jena.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12.01.2017 15:57, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I want to ask Lorenz, about the Then part of the rule:
>>>>>
>>>>> THEN    -> team FavoriteLeague is FACup
>>>>>
>>>>> FACup is the resource in my owl (just followed Create Instance tab in
>>>>> Protege and Protege has give it the default URI like other resources in
>>>>>
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>>> file).
>>>>>
>>>>> Before we execute the rule, is it must that we should declare it in
>>>>> Java
>>>>> code like we do in Jena class before using it in Rules like
>>>>> OntClass team = model.getOntClass(ns + "Team")
>>>>>
>>>>> Because I am sure the problem lies in the resource FACup (or its URI).
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Lorenz B. <
>>>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't understand your problem now, sorry. It's too confusing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You said that you changed the whole ontology: upload it somewhere such
>>>>>> that we can see it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Show the final rule that doesn't work, not in pseudo-syntax but how
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> use it in Jena.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Upload the code somewhere
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am sorry for any inconvenience I have created. I really dont know
>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> create minimal code snippet or uses Github.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Coming to the problem, what I noticed is the problem is in the object
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> i-e
>>>>
>>>>> FACup here.
>>>>>>> team1  FavoriteLeague  FACup
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because I made changes and coming to the down, used different
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> properties
>>>>
>>>>> (in place of  FavoriteLeague), and made the rule simple to:
>>>>>>> If x is a Team, then x FavoriteLeague is FACup ,
>>>>>>> If x is a Team, then x Wins is FACup etc just for simplicity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In a nutshell, changed everything except object of rule FACup and it
>>>>>>> appears in Annotation area so the problem for sure is in the URI of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> FACup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now about resources FACup, PremierLeague, ChampionsLeague, these are
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> not
>>>>
>>>>> associated with anything in the ontology (neither Types of anything,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> nor
>>>>
>>>>> data/object assertions), rather I just created it in Protege with URI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> like
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> other resources.
>>>>>>> URI of Team Class: http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team
>>>>>>> URI of FavoriteCategory : http://www.semanticweb.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> soccer#FavoriteCategory
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and URI of FACup: http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I dont know if it is mandatory to get the value of resource
>>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup first before the rules
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> executes
>>>>
>>>>> because simple putting it in the rules not working for me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry once again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Lorenz B. <
>>>>>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in your last answer you wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *String ns="http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer
>>>>>>>> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals>#";*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if you provide us no information and the information that you
>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> is
>>>>
>>>>> of such poor quality, then it's not possible to help you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Last time that I'll write this here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. provide the WHOLE ontology (there are many services only where
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> can put your file online for free)
>>>>>>>> 2. show the minimal code snippet that makes it possible to see that
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> doesn't work
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or put everything into a Github project
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Lorenz, the ns is wrong, how?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> String ns="http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rule:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (?x http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://
>>>>>>>>> www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team) "
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  + "( ?x http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals  ?goals )" +
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>         "greaterThan(?goals,30)
>>>>>>>>>          + " ->  (?x  http://www.semanticweb.org/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> soccer#FavioriteLeague
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup  )]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Lorenz Buehmann <
>>>>>>>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11.01.2017 22:10, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Lorenz, I am sure I have used the FavoriteLeague as Data
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Property
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Protege and it has the same URI as other data properties and
>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> resources in the ontology ie  http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals>FavoriteLeague.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have changed the spelling of FavoriteLeague. to FavoLeague,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> favLeague,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but every time the same disappointing result.
>>>>>>>>>>> My namespace is also same in whole program:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *String ns="http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals>#";*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ehm that's a totally wrong namespace declaration. To be honest, I
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> understand why you don't see this...and the namespace in the rule is
>>>>>>>>>> obviously NOT the same then
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> favleague is declared as:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  *OntProperty favleague=model.getOntProperty(ns+
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "FavoriteLeague");*
>>>>
>>>>> Please tell me, what do you think is the concatenation of the String
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the variable ns and the String "FavoriteLeague" ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> //All my data properties are declared like this and it works.  For
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ex:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Goal
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> property
>>>>>>>>>>> OntProperty goals=model.getOntProperty(ns+ "Goals");
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Lorenz Buehmann <
>>>>>>>>>>> buehm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris is right. It's beginning to become annoying if youalways
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ignore
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> our advices to show data + the code - all the code. Even now you
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> omitted
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> information like
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * the declaration of the variable ns
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> * the declaration of the variable favcat
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And indeed the data. IF you have anywhere in the code and/or
>>>>>>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>
>>>>> typo, the rule not "fire", thus no data will be inferred. In your
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> case,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure that data is inferred (you said that Protege shows
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> annotation) - but the inferred property is nowhere declared as
>>>>>>>>>>>> owl:DatatypeProperty in the ontology. This is mandotory for
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OWL/OWL
>>>>
>>>>> API/Protege
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11.01.2017 16:48, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I used like this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *OntProperty favleague=model.getOntProperty(ns+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "FavioriteLeague");*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then I wrote this rule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (?x http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#Team) "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  + "( ?x http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACupGoals  ?goals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> )" +
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>         "greaterThan(?goals,30)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>          + " ->  (?x  http://www.semanticweb.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> soccer#FavioriteLeague
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.semanticweb.org/soccer#FACup  )]";
>>>>>>>>>>>>> //FACupe is resource in the ontology:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   *inf.listStatements(null,favcat,(RDFNode)null);*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the problem is not in typo because I run similar rule
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> data property FavioriteStadium and it also saves in Annotation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Chris Dollin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> chris.dol...@epimorphics.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/01/17 15:15, neha gupta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even this not works
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  inf.listStatements(null,favleague,(RDFNode)null);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gives the result but in Annotation area of Protege
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COMPLETE MINIMAL EXAMPLE, please. You have so many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> errors & omissions in the code you show us we can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tell which one is the one you're asking about.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If Protege is putting things in the annotation area
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd guess that means the thing isn't declared as either
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a DataProperty or an ObjectProperty. Given your erratic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spelling that's quite likely.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "He could not weigh up which was worse and so tried not to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> either."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                                 /The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spellgrinder's
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apprentice/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bristol
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BS20
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6PT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (number
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 7016688)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Lorenz Bühmann
>>>>>>>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>>>>>>>> Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Lorenz Bühmann
>>>>>> AKSW group, University of Leipzig
>>>>>> Group: http://aksw.org - semantic web research center
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to