May I ask if there are there some Windows users who read this post and who 
successfully installed sci_ipopt or fmincon ?

S.

> Le 5 juin 2021 à 15:21, Éric Dubois <grocer.tool...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> 
> Thanks Stéphane for your quick answer
> 
> I have tried installing fmincon first, then scicolpack (it works), then 
> sci_ipopt  and it does not work: only file 
> sci_ipopt_1.3.bin.x64.Windows.zipis downloaded. So it seems:
> - first that dependencies are not deal with for the fmincon distribution that 
> Atoms uses;
> - second, that there is some problem using Atoms for loading  sci_ipopt
> 
> Maybe I should not use Atoms, but when it works it is the most convenient way 
> to download a module.
> 
> Éric
> 
>       Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com
> 
>> Le sam. 5 juin 2021 à 14:06, Stéphane Mottelet <stephane.motte...@utc.fr> a 
>> écrit :
>> Hi Eric, 
>> 
>> Could you be more precise ? I have I installed fmincon on at least 10 
>> different machines for testing purposes  (mostly under Windows 10) and did 
>> not encounter any problem. Atoms is, I must say, a very unstable (not to say 
>> crappy) piece of software and in particular very hard to use smoothly when 
>> your are developing some modules and play e.g. with offline mode. 
>> 
>> What I would do first is to uninstall every module then install fmincon. If 
>> problem is still here please help me by debugging a bit...
>> 
>> S.
>> 
>>>> Le 5 juin 2021 à 11:29, Éric Dubois <grocer.tool...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hello Stéphane
>>> 
>>> This seems very interesting, but download through Atoms does not work (at 
>>> least for me: I use Scilab 6.1.0 under Windows 10): dependencies 
>>> (Sci-colpac, Sci-IPOt, for those I have noticed) are not dealt with. 
>>> Moreover, trying to install Sci-IPOt with Atoms fails. By the way it makes 
>>> also make fail lthe oading of  any module that could have been installed 
>>> with Atoms, which reveals an undesirable feature of Atoms: failure to load 
>>> a module should not prevent the loading of other ones.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Éric 
>>> 
>>>     Garanti sans virus. www.avast.com
>>> 
>>>> Le mar. 1 juin 2021 à 12:21, Stéphane Mottelet <stephane.motte...@utc.fr> 
>>>> a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Le 01/06/2021 à 09:53, CHEZE David 227480 a écrit :
>>>> > Dear Stephane,
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you for offering these enhanced capabilities in Scilab, fmincon 
>>>> > and SciIPOpt. I'm about giving a try in comparison with leastsq(), on 
>>>> > dynamic model parameter (~5-10) calibration purpose, based on 
>>>> > measurement deviation, as time series (250 to >1000 samples). In general 
>>>> > for fmincon and SciIPOpt, may I provide the objective function with 
>>>> > inputs argument through the list() syntax like 
>>>> > objf=list(myofunction,x,in1,in2,..) ?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, you have such an example in the fitting demo ;
>>>> 
>>>> https://gitlab.com/esi-group/scilab/forge/fmincont/-/blob/master/demos/fmincon_fit.sce
>>>> 
>>>> S.
>>>> 
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you for your advice,
>>>> >
>>>> > David
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > -----Message d'origine-----
>>>> > De : users <users-boun...@lists.scilab.org> De la part de Stéphane 
>>>> > Mottelet
>>>> > Envoyé : lundi 19 avril 2021 10:43
>>>> > À : Users mailing list for Scilab <users@lists.scilab.org>
>>>> > Objet : [Scilab-users] fmincon toolbox update
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > I would like to inform you that the fmincon toolbox has been updated
>>>> > (https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/v3?i=cWdzUmRSM0ZiRHpoUDkxTSw3-90dQgKDkqmWWemZ6js&r=WXNQOUY5VXRSNUlTdlVTTgAgPzRHrDev93-c71JTxG3gYERdftx8enpEGCicW5Zy&f=R0pWUVNEaUFuMTBCTlptbqaYxU0NWnHz-Aov_fSSM1D4vfIz2L0jb50-moW0RphD&u=https%3A//atoms.scilab.org/toolboxes/fmincon/1.0.2&k=8YLU)
>>>> >  and now includes a major feature:  the Efficient Computation of Sparse 
>>>> > Hessian using Coloring algorithm (scicolpack is now a  dependency of 
>>>> > fmincon). This feature was missing and now allows fmincon to consider 
>>>> > really big problems. A example of such is given in the "minimal surface 
>>>> > demo" which compares 3 different approaches of the problem: one with 
>>>> > finite differences gradient, and BFGS Hessian, one with exact gradient 
>>>> > and BFGS Hessian, and the last with exact gradient and finite 
>>>> > differences sparse Hessian. The time factor between the first and the 
>>>> > third approchach is around 200 for a 21x21 square but you can edit the 
>>>> > demo file and increase this value. For a 51x51 square the third approach 
>>>> > takes only
>>>> > 0.45 seconds and is 2500 times faster. For a 101x101 square the first 
>>>> > approach takes forever and the third ones takes less than 2 seconds and 
>>>> > is still 10 times faster than the second one.
>>>> >
>>>> > If some of you still use other softwares for large scale optimization, 
>>>> > maybe you can now give Scilab a try. If you need a better control on 
>>>> > parameters and/or if you are not a former/actual user of Matlab's 
>>>> > fmincon, I recommend using directly ipopt (from sci_ipopt toolbox). But 
>>>> > the fmincon api is quite easy to use. Don't hesitate to took at the code 
>>>> > of the several new demos.
>>>> >
>>>> > Don't hesitate to contact me if you have some problems using fmincon of 
>>>> > just to say that you are using it with success !
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Stéphane Mottelet
>>>> > Ingénieur de recherche
>>>> > EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable Département 
>>>> > Génie des Procédés Industriels Sorbonne Universités - Université de 
>>>> > Technologie de Compiègne CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex Tel : 
>>>> > +33(0)344234688 
>>>> > https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/v3?i=cWdzUmRSM0ZiRHpoUDkxTSw3-90dQgKDkqmWWemZ6js&r=WXNQOUY5VXRSNUlTdlVTTgAgPzRHrDev93-c71JTxG3gYERdftx8enpEGCicW5Zy&f=R0pWUVNEaUFuMTBCTlptbqaYxU0NWnHz-Aov_fSSM1D4vfIz2L0jb50-moW0RphD&u=http%3A//www.utc.fr/~mottelet&k=8YLU
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > users mailing list
>>>> > users@lists.scilab.org
>>>> > https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/v3?i=cWdzUmRSM0ZiRHpoUDkxTSw3-90dQgKDkqmWWemZ6js&r=WXNQOUY5VXRSNUlTdlVTTgAgPzRHrDev93-c71JTxG3gYERdftx8enpEGCicW5Zy&f=R0pWUVNEaUFuMTBCTlptbqaYxU0NWnHz-Aov_fSSM1D4vfIz2L0jb50-moW0RphD&u=http%3A//lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users&k=8YLU
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > users mailing list
>>>> > users@lists.scilab.org
>>>> > https://antispam.utc.fr/proxy/v3?i=cWdzUmRSM0ZiRHpoUDkxTSw3-90dQgKDkqmWWemZ6js&r=WXNQOUY5VXRSNUlTdlVTTgAgPzRHrDev93-c71JTxG3gYERdftx8enpEGCicW5Zy&f=R0pWUVNEaUFuMTBCTlptbqaYxU0NWnHz-Aov_fSSM1D4vfIz2L0jb50-moW0RphD&u=http%3A//lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users&k=8YLU
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Stéphane Mottelet
>>>> Ingénieur de recherche
>>>> EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
>>>> Département Génie des Procédés Industriels
>>>> Sorbonne Universités - Université de Technologie de Compiègne
>>>> CS 60319, 60203 Compiègne cedex
>>>> Tel : +33(0)344234688
>>>> http://www.utc.fr/~mottelet
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> users@lists.scilab.org
>>>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> users@lists.scilab.org
>>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.scilab.org
>> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to