On 01/08/2013 5:55 PM, Jonathan Sharp wrote:
I think John C raises an interesting case here, where the voting process
can fall down.
A large code dump like that can hurt the quality of documentation and
support (in addition to team morale).
It depends on how good the code and documentation is!
If the PMC can not deal with the amount of code being proposed, they
need to increase the PMC.
In the meantime, they can always defer the acceptance.
I would love to have the problem of my team producing too much tested
code and documentation for me to read!!!
Ron
My $.02
Jon
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:36 PM, John Casey <[email protected]> wrote:
It's about whether you expect to do a ton of work outside the community
here, outside the commit logs and the review, in order to avoid the
discussion and potential for veto.
Working in this way opens the possibility for changing the rules for who
gets to contribute, especially when code diverges for long periods then
gets reconciled with a massive rebase.
ASF is supposed to be about more than code. We're supposed to be working
together on this project. I feel like the above hamstrings that whole
process.
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: [email protected]
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
